Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226299›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Automated analysis and reannotation of subcellular locations in confocal images from the Human Protein Atlas.

Jieyue Li, Justin Y Newberg, Mathias Uhlén, Emma Lundberg, Robert F Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drug response in the era of precision medicine: A methodological review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Subcellular proteomics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. COMPARTMENTS: unification and visualization of protein subcellular localization evidence.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jieyue LiCenter for Bioimage Informatics and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Justin Y Newberg
Mathias Uhlén
Emma Lundberg
Robert F Murphy

Funding

BUILDING AND VALIDATING LOCATION PROTEOMICS DATABASESR01GM075205 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, ROBERT F · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM075205NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Human Protein Atlas contains immunofluorescence images showing subcellular locations for thousands of proteins. These are currently annotated by visual inspection. In this paper, we describe automated approaches to analyze the images and their use to improve annotation. We began by training classifiers to recognize the annotated patterns. By ranking proteins according to the confidence of the classifier, we generated a list of proteins that were strong candidates for reexamination. In parallel, we applied hierarchical clustering to group proteins and identified proteins whose annotations were inconsistent with the remainder of the proteins in their cluster. These proteins were reexamined by the original annotators, and a significant fraction had their annotations changed. The results demonstrate that automated approaches can provide an important complement to visual annotation.

Indexed as

Microscopy, ConfocalArtificial IntelligenceAutomationCell Line, TumorHumansIntracellular SpaceMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein Transport

Identifiers

PMID23226299
PMCPMC3511558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.