ArticlePloS one2012
Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters.Implementation science : IS · 2014Pooled it
- Variation in patients' perceptions of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Trial
- Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Stable Angina and Severe Aortic Stenosis.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Developing an Individualized Patient Decision Aid for Chronic Coronary Disease Based on the ISCHEMIA Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
- A Geriatric Approach to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Older Adults, Part II: AJACC. Advances · 2023Article
- What helps the successful implementation of digital decision aids supporting shared decision-making in cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2023Review
- Development and user-testing of a digital patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for people with stable angina.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Ten-year clinical outcomes in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis according to the combined culprit lesion.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
- Availability and use of number needed to treat (NNT) based decision aids for pharmaceutical interventions.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021Review
- Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Is Better Patient Knowledge Associated with Different Treatment Preferences? A Survey of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Priorities for Patient-Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Patient and physician communication challenges and shared decision making.World journal of clinical cases · 2018Review
- Exploring the Healthcare Value of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Costs in Michigan Hospitals.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2018Article
- Patient-Centered Decision Support: Formative Usability Evaluation of Integrated Clinical Decision Support With a Patient Decision Aid for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Revascularization and outcomes in Veterans with moderate to severe ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging.Military Medical Research · 2017Article
- Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016Article
- Within-the-Clinic Shared Decision for an Over-the-Counter Medication.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and optimal medical therapy (OMT) are comparable, alternative therapies for many patients with stable angina; however, patients may have misconceptions regarding the impact of PCI on risk of death and myocardial infarction (MI) in stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND
resultsWe designed and developed a patient-centered decision aid (PCI Choice) to promote shared decision making for patients with stable CAD. The estimated benefits and risks of PCI+OMT as compared to OMT were displayed in a decision aid using pictographs with natural frequencies and text. We engaged patients, clinicians, health service researchers, and designers with over 20 successive iterations of the decision aid, which were field tested during real-world clinical encounters involving clinicians and patients. The decision aid is intended to facilitate knowledge transfer, deliberation based on patient values and preferences, and shared decision making.
conclusionsWe describe the methods and outcomes of the design and development of a decision aid (PCI Choice) to promote shared decision making between clinicians and patients regarding the choice of PCI+OMT vs. OMT for treatment of stable CAD. We will evaluate the impact of PCI Choice on patient knowledge, decisional conflict, participation in decision-making, and treatment choice in an upcoming randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.