Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2012

Biological sources of inflexibility in brain and behavior with aging and neurodegenerative diseases.

S Lee Hong, George V Rebec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Lee HongDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University Athens, OH, USA.
George V Rebec
Indiana University Bloomington · USOhio University · US

Funding

ASCORBATE AS EXTRACELLULAR NEUROMODULATOR IN NEOSTRIATUMR01NS035663 · NINDS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI REBEC, GEORGE VINCENT · 1996 to 2008
$969k
Exploring the Neuromechanics of Fall-Risk in AgingR21AG035158 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KOCEJA, DAVID · 2010 to 2011
$354k
Environmental Enriched Animal Models of Aging: Roles of Motor Variation and NeuraR21AG039818 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HONG, SIANG LEE, REBEC, GEORGE VINCENT · 2011 to 2012
$316k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG035158NIA NIH HHS R21 AG039818NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Almost unequivocally, aging and neurodegeneration lead to deficits in neural information processing. These declines are marked by increased neural noise that is associated with increased variability or inconsistency in behavioral patterns. While it is often viewed that these problems arise from dysregulation of dopamine (DA), a monoamine modulator, glutamate (GLU), an excitatory amino acid that interacts with DA, also plays a role in determining the level of neural noise. We review literature demonstrating that neural noise is highest at both high and low levels of DA and GLU, allowing their interaction to form a many-to-one solution map for neural noise modulation. With aging and neurodegeneration, the range over which DA and GLU can be modulated is decreased leading to inflexibility in brain activity and behavior. As the capacity to modulate neural noise is restricted, the ability to shift noise from one brain region to another is reduced, leading to greater uniformity in signal-to-noise ratios across the entire brain. A negative consequence at the level of behavior is inflexibility that reduces the ability to: (1) switch from one behavior to another; and (2) stabilize a behavioral pattern against external perturbations. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework where inflexibility across brain and behavior, rather than inconsistency and variability is the more important problem in aging and neurodegeneration. This theoretical framework of inflexibility in aging and neurodegeneration leads to the hypotheses that: (1) dysfunction in either or both of the DA and GLU systems restricts the ability to modulate neural noise; and (2) levels of neural noise and variability in brain activation will be dedifferentiated and more evenly distributed across the brain; and (3) changes in neural noise and behavioral variability in response to different task demands and changes in the environment will be reduced.

Indexed as

agingdopamineglutamatesneural noiseneurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID23226117
PMCPMC3510451
OpenAlexW2069502018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.