Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23226107›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2012

Uptake of home-based voluntary HIV testing in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kalpana Sabapathy, Rafael Van den Bergh, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Nathan Ford

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 135 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01900977 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Population Effects of Antiretroviral Therapy to Reduce HIV Transmission (PopART): A Cluster-randomized Trial of the Impact of a Combination Prevention Package on Population-level HIV Incidence in Zambia and South Africa

TypeinterventionalSponsorHIV Prevention Trials NetworkRan2014 to 2018Enrolled48,540ConditionsHIVArmsUniversal Testing with immediate ART, Universal Testing with ART eligibility according to National Guidelines, Standard of Care
NCT03537872 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

PROvide MIner-friendly SErvices for Integrated TB/HIV Care in Lesotho Study (PROMISE Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled248ConditionsHIVArmsMiner-Friendly (MF) Service Venues TB/HIV Integration Strategies, Public Sector (PS) Health Facilities TB/HIV Integration Strategies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 227 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kalpana SabapathyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. kalpana.sabapathy@lshtm.ac.uk
Rafael Van den Bergh
Sarah Fidler
Richard Hayes
Nathan Ford
Imperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMédecins Sans Frontières · BEUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImproving access to HIV testing is a key priority in scaling up HIV treatment and prevention services. Home-based voluntary counselling and testing (HBT) as an approach to delivering wide-scale HIV testing is explored here. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of studies published between 1 January 2000 and 24 September 2012 that reported on uptake of HBT in sub-Saharan Africa, to assess the proportion of individuals accepting HBT and receiving their test result. Our initial search yielded 1,199 articles; 114 were reviewed as full-text articles, and 19 publications involving 21 studies (n = 524,867 individuals offered HBT) were included for final review and meta-analysis. The studies came from five countries: Uganda, Malawi, Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia. The proportion of people who accepted HBT (n = 474,377) ranged from 58.1% to 99.8%, with a pooled proportion of 83.3% (95% CI: 80.4%-86.1%). Heterogeneity was high (τ(2) = 0.11). Sixteen studies reported on the number of people who received the result of HBT (n = 432,835). The proportion of individuals receiving their results out of all those offered testing ranged from 24.9% to 99.7%, with a pooled proportion of 76.7% (95% CI: 73.4%-80.0%) (τ(2) = 0.12). HIV prevalence ranged from 2.9% to 36.5%. New diagnosis of HIV following HBT ranged from 40% to 79% of those testing positive. Forty-eight percent of the individuals offered testing were men, and they were just as likely to accept HBT as women (pooled odds ratio = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.56-1.26) (τ(2) = 0.33). The proportion of individuals previously tested for HIV among those offered a test ranged from 5% to 66%. Studies in which <30% of individuals had been previously tested, local HIV prevalence was <10%, incentives were provided, or HBT was offered to household members of HIV-positive individuals showed higher uptake of testing. No evidence was reported of negative consequences of HBT.

conclusionsHBT could substantially increase awareness of HIV status in previously undiagnosed individuals in sub-Saharan Africa, with over three-quarters of the studies in this review reporting >70% uptake. It could be a valuable tool for treatment and prevention efforts.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHome Care ServicesAfrica South of the SaharaCounselingHIV InfectionsHumansPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID23226107
PMCPMC3514284
OpenAlexW2076330062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.