ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2013
Improvement and influencing factors of blood pressure control by nephrologist referral in chronic kidney disease patients in China: a cohort study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure among patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease in Vietnam.Belitung nursing journal · 2021Article
- Changes of miR-155 expression in serum of uremic patients before and after treatment and risk factors analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Antihypertensive therapy prescribing patterns and correlates of blood pressure control among hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHypertension is an independent risk factor for mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is suboptimally controlled worldwide. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the rate of BP control and the main barriers to achieving target BP, according to K/DOQI guidelines, in China.
methodsWe performed a single-center, prospective cohort study. Two hundred and sixty CKD patients were referred by general physicians to nephrologists, and their BP was treated in accordance with K/DOQI guidelines for a 1-year follow-up. We evaluated improvement of BP target achievement and factors affecting BP control. We defined "not-at-goal" as persistence of systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg after 1 year.
resultsThe BP decreased from 138 ± 12/84 ± 7 mmHg at baseline to 124 ± 13/73 ± 7 mmHg after 1 year. The rate of achieving the BP goal (<130/80 mmHg) increased from 25.4 to 61.5 %. The decrease in BP was associated with a significant reduction of proteinuria (median, 0.14 vs 0.06 g/24 h; P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified proteinuria levels ≥1.0 g/24 h (odds ratio [OR]: 5.21; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.37-19.77) and high basal systolic BP (OR: 2.17; 95 % CI: 1.25-3.77) and diastolic BP (OR: 6.62; 95 % CI: 2.03-21.60) as independent predictors of not-at-goal BP. Higher educational level was independently associated with at-goal BP (OR: 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.06-0.78).
conclusionsIn CKD patients, BP control is poor when managed by general physicians and may be improved after nephrologist referral. High basal BP and proteinuria levels ≥1.0 g/24 h are the main barriers that preclude the optimal control of BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.