Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224866›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2013

20 years from NCX purification and cloning: milestones.

Debora A Nicoll, Michela Ottolia, Joshua I Goldhaber, Kenneth D Philipson

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular determinants of pH regulation in the cardiac NaThe Journal of general physiology · 2018
    Article
  5. Second Messengers.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debora A NicollDepartment of Physiology and Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1760, USA.
Michela Ottolia
Joshua I Goldhaber
Kenneth D Philipson
University of California, Los Angeles · USCedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute · US

Funding

Molecular Biology of Cardiac Sodium-Calcium ExchangeR01HL048509 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GOLDHABER, JOSHUA I, PHILIPSON, KENNETH · 2002 to 2016
$4.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL048509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger protein was first isolated from cardiac sarcolemma in 1988 and cloned in 1990. This allowed study of Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange at the molecular level to begin. I will review the story leading to the cloning of NCX and the research that resulted from this event. This will include structure-function studies such as determination of the numbers of transmembrane segments and topological arrangement. Information on ion transport sites has been gathered from site-directed mutagenesis. The regions involved in Ca(2+) regulation have been identified, analyzed, and crystallized.We have also generated genetically altered mice to study the role of NCX in the myocardium. Of special interest are mice with atrial- or ventricular-specific KO of NCX that reveal new information on the role of NCX in excitation-contraction coupling and in cardiac pacemaker activity.

Indexed as

Cloning, MolecularMuscle ProteinsMyocardiumSarcolemmaSodium-Calcium ExchangerAnimalsAnniversaries and Special EventsBiological ClocksBiomedical ResearchHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansIon TransportMiceMice, TransgenicMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMuscle ProteinsSodium-Calcium Exchanger

Identifiers

PMID23224866
PMCPMC3903337
OpenAlexW161363651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.