Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224838›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2014

Dash of faith: a faith-based participatory research pilot study.

Brook E Harmon, Swann A Adams, Dolores Scott, Yvonne S Gladman, Bernice Ezell, James R Hebert

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Fulfilling Ethical Responsibility: Moving Beyond the Minimal Standards of Protecting Human Subjects from Research Harm.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brook E HarmonSouth Carolina Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Ste 200, Columbia, SC, 20208, USA, brookharmon@sc.edu.
Swann A Adams
Dolores Scott
Yvonne S Gladman
Bernice Ezell
James R Hebert

Funding

Training ProgramU54CA153461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community NetworksU01CA114601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2005 to 2010
$3.8M
Expanding Mentoring Capacity in High-Risk PopulationsK05CA136975 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$801k
NCI NIH HHS 1 U01 CA114601-01NCI NIH HHS 5 U54 CA153461-03NCI NIH HHS K05 CA136975NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114601NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dash of Faith pilot used a community-based participatory research approach to design an experiential dietary intervention based on two African-American churches, one intervention and one comparison. Congregation members identified components that were incorporated into 12 weekly and 4 monthly sessions, with a goal of increasing fruit and vegetable and lowering fat intake. At 2 months, a marginally significant (p = 0.07) increase in fruit and vegetable consumption was observed in the intervention group but was not maintained at study conclusion. We propose that these mixed findings may be attributable, in part, to bias introduced by the participatory nature of the design.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchReligion and PsychologyAgedBlack or African AmericanDiet, Fat-RestrictedFeeding BehaviorFemaleFruitHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsVegetables

Identifiers

PMID23224838
PMCPMC3773027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.