Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224710›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2013

Cell signaling pathways in vertebrate lens regeneration.

Jonathan J Henry, Alvin G Thomas, Paul W Hamilton, Lisa Moore, Kimberly J Perry

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lens regenerationiScience · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Recent developments in cataract surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Using theFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan J HenryDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. j-henry4@life.illinois.edu
Alvin G Thomas
Paul W Hamilton
Lisa Moore
Kimberly J Perry
Goodwin College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUrbana University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BASIS OF LENS DEVELOPMENTR01EY009844 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HENRY, JONATHAN J · 1993 to 2010
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain vertebrates are capable of regenerating parts of the eye, including the lens. Depending on the species, two principal forms of in vivo lens regeneration have been described wherein the new lens arises from either the pigmented epithelium of the dorsal iris or the cornea epithelium. These forms of lens regeneration are triggered by retinal factors present in the eye. Studies have begun to illuminate the nature of the signals that support lens regeneration. This review describes evidence for the involvement of specific signaling pathways in lens regeneration, including the FGF, retinoic acid, TGF-beta, Wnt, and Hedgehog pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsFibroblast Growth FactorsHedgehog ProteinsLens, CrystallineRegenerationSignal TransductionTransforming Growth Factor betaTretinoinWnt Signaling PathwayFibroblast Growth FactorsHedgehog ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor betaTretinoin

Identifiers

PMID23224710
PMCPMC4304700
OpenAlexW2183928429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.