ArticleScience and engineering ethics2013
The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Pooled it
- Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Pooled it
- Responsibly shaping technology innovation for the energy transition: an RRI indicator system as a tool.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2023Article
- Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Chemical Research and Development: A Dual Advantage for Sustainability.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- A Framework for Ethical Research and Innovation.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Valuing biomarker diagnostics for dementia care: enhancing the reflection of patients, their care-givers and members of the wider public.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019Article
- Organizing a Collaborative Development of Technological Design Requirements Using a Constructive Dialogue on Value Profiles: A Case in Automated Vehicle Development.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Creative tensions: mutual responsiveness adapted to private sector research and development.Life sciences, society and policy · 2017Article
- A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Article
- Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.Science and engineering ethics · 2017Review
- Towards a phronetic space for responsible research (and innovation).Life sciences, society and policy · 2016Article
- Responsible Reporting: Neuroimaging News in the Age of Responsible Research and Innovation.Science and engineering ethics · 2016Article
- Nanocommunication design in graduate-level education and research training programs at Osaka University.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New and Emerging Science and Technology (NEST) based innovations, e.g. in the field of Life Sciences or Nanotechnology, frequently raise societal and political concerns. To address these concerns NEST researchers are expected to deploy socially responsible R&D practices. This requires researchers to integrate social and ethical aspects (SEAs) in their daily work. Many methods can facilitate such integration. Still, why and how researchers should and could use SEAs remains largely unclear. In this paper we aim to relate motivations for NEST researchers to include SEAs in their work, and the requirements to establish such integration from their perspectives, to existing approaches that can be used to establish integration of SEAs in the daily work of these NEST researchers. Based on our analyses, we argue that for the successful integration of SEAs in R&D practice, collaborative approaches between researchers and scholars from the social sciences and humanities seem the most successful. The only way to explore whether that is in fact the case, is by embarking on collaborative research endeavours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23224703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.