Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224510›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2013

Pre-encoding administration of amphetamine or THC preferentially modulates emotional memory in humans.

Michael E Ballard, David A Gallo, Harriet de Wit

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MDMA Impairs Both the Encoding and Retrieval of Emotional Recollections.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effects of ∆BMC psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  6. ΔBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Amphetamine increases errors during episodic memory retrieval.Journal of clinical psychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael E BallardDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
David A Gallo
Harriet de Wit
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOLGY TRG FOR DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007255 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI VEZINA, PAUL R · 1991 to 2012
$5.9M
Memory effects of stimulant drugs in humansR21DA031796 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2012 to 2013
$411k
The effect of amphetamine on the different stages of emotional memoryF31DA030863 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BALLARD, MICHAEL EDWARD · 2011 to 2012
$62k
NIDA NIH HHS DA02812NIDA NIH HHS DA031796NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA030863NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA031796NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMany addictive drugs are known to have effects on learning and memory, and these effects could motivate future drug use. Specifically, addictive drugs may affect memory of emotional events and experiences in ways that are attractive to some users. However, few studies have investigated the effects of addictive drugs on emotional memory in humans.

objectivesThis study examined the effects of the memory-enhancing drug dextroamphetamine (AMP) and the memory-impairing drug Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on emotional memory in healthy volunteers.

methodsParticipants completed three experimental sessions across which they received capsules containing placebo and two doses of either AMP (10 and 20 mg; N = 25) or THC (7.5 and 15 mg; N = 25) before viewing pictures of positive (pleasant), neutral, and negative (unpleasant) scenes. Memory for the pictures was assessed 2 days later, under drug-free conditions.

resultsRelative to placebo, memory for emotional pictures was improved by AMP and impaired by THC, but neither drug significantly affected memory for unemotional pictures. Positive memory biases were not observed with either drug, and there was no indication that the drugs' memory effects were directly related to their subjective or physiological effects alone.

conclusionsThis study provides the first clear evidence that stimulant drugs can preferentially strengthen, and cannabinoids can preferentially impair, memory for emotional events in humans. Although addictive drugs do not appear to positively bias memory, the possibility remains that these drugs' effects on emotional memory could influence drug use among certain individuals.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Over StudiesDextroamphetamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryYoung AdultDextroamphetamineDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID23224510
PMCPMC3595317
OpenAlexW2102238083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.