Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224422›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2013

Agonist high- and low-affinity states of dopamine D₂ receptors: methods of detection and clinical implications.

Jan-Peter van Wieringen, Jan Booij, Vladimir Shalgunov, Philip Elsinga, Martin C Michel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of [ACS omega · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dopamine DInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Agonist-induced desensitisation of βBritish journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Heightened Dopaminergic Response to Amphetamine at the DNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Estimating endogenous dopamine levels at D2 and D3 receptors in humans using the agonist radiotracer [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan-Peter van WieringenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan Booij
Vladimir Shalgunov
Philip Elsinga
Martin C Michel
Academic Medical Center · NLJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine D(2) receptors, similar to other G-protein-coupled receptors, exist in a high- and low-affinity state for agonists. Based upon a review of the methods for detecting D(2) receptor agonist high-affinity states, we discuss alterations of such states in animal models of disease and the implications of such alterations for their labelling with positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracers. The classic approach of detecting agonist high-affinity states compares agonist competition for antagonist radioligands, in most cases using [(3)H]-spiperone as the radioligand; alternative approaches and radioligands have been proposed, but their claimed advantages have not been substantiated by other investigators. In view of the advantages and disadvantages of various techniques, we critically have reviewed reported findings on the detection of D(2) receptor agonist high-affinity states in a variety of animal models. These data are compared to the less numerous findings from human in vivo studies based on PET and SPECT tracers; they are interpreted in light of the finding that D(2) receptor agonist high-affinity states under control conditions may differ between rodent and human brain. The potential advantages of agonist ligands in studies of pathophysiology and as diagnostics are being discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDopamine AgonistsHumansLigandsPositron-Emission TomographyReceptors, Dopamine D2Dopamine AgonistsLigandsReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID23224422
OpenAlexW2140430269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.