Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224377›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2013

Reproducibility of computed tomography angiography data analysis using semiautomated plaque quantification software: implications for the design of longitudinal studies.

Stella-Lida Papadopoulou, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Alexia Rossi, Chrysafios Girasis, Anoeshka S Dharampal, Pieter H Kitslaar, Gabriel P Krestin, Pim J de Feyter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Inter-reader variability of SPECT MPI readings in low- and middle-income countries: Results from the IAEA-MPI Audit Project (I-MAP).Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stella-Lida PapadopoulouDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Room Ca 207, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. elpa98@gmail.com
Hector M Garcia-Garcia
Alexia Rossi
Chrysafios Girasis
Anoeshka S Dharampal
Pieter H Kitslaar
Gabriel P Krestin
Pim J de Feyter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproducibility of the quantitative assessment of atherosclerosis by computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is paramount for the design of longitudinal studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility using semiautomated CT plaque analysis software in symptomatic individuals. CTCA was performed in 10 symptomatic patients after percutaneous treatment of the culprit lesions and was repeated after 3 years. The plaque quantitative analysis was performed in untreated vessels with mild-to-moderate atherosclerosis and included geometrical and compositional characteristics using semiautomated CT plaque analysis software. A total of 945 matched cross-sections from 21 segments were analyzed independently by a second reviewer to assess inter-observer variability; the first observer repeated all the analyses after 3 months to assess intra-observer variability. The observer variability was also compared to the absolute plaque changes detected over time. Agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficient. Inter-observer relative differences for lumen, vessel, plaque area and plaque burden were 1.2, 0.6, 2.2, 1.6% respectively. Intra-observer relative differences for lumen, vessel, plaque area and plaque burden were 1.0, 0.4, 0.2, 0.4% respectively. For the average plaque attenuation values the inter- and intra-observer variability was 5 and 2% respectively. For the % low-attenuation-plaque the inter- and intra-observer variability was 16 and 6% respectively. The absolute intra-observer variability for the plaque burden was 1.30 ± 1.09%, while the temporal plaque burden difference was 3.55 ± 3.02 % (p = 0.001). The present study shows that the geometrical assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by CTCA is highly reproducible within and between observers using semiautomated quantification software and that serial plaque changes can be detected beyond observer variability. The compositional measurements are more variable between observers than geometrical measurements.

Indexed as

Plaque, AtheroscleroticRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedResearch DesignSoftwareTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomation, LaboratoryCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.