Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2013
Comparison of the developmental tests Bayley-III and Bayley-II in 7-month-old infants born preterm.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of motor development delay in children with craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- DFC-Igloo: A dynamic functional connectome learning framework for identifying neurodevelopmental biomarkers in very preterm infants.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Use of term reference infants in assessing the developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants: lessons learned in a multicenter study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Observational
- A self-training deep neural network for early prediction of cognitive deficits in very preterm infants using brain functional connectome data.Pediatric radiology · 2022Article
- Association between early-term birth and delayed neurodevelopment at the age of 2 years: results from a cohort study in China.European journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Neuropsychomotor development in children born preterm at 6 and 12 months of corrected gestational age.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2021Article
- Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment developmental and socio-emotional scales: reliability and predictive value in an at-risk population.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2020Article
- Which Bayley-III cut-off values should be used in different developmental levels?Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Predictive Value of the BSID-II and the Bayley-III for Early School Age Cognitive Function in Very Preterm Infants.Global pediatric health · 2020Article
- Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2019Article
- Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2018Article
- Are the Norms of Bayley Screening Test Appropriate for Persian Language Children?Iranian journal of child neurology · 2018Article
- The Validity of the Bayley-III and DDST-II in Preterm Infants With Neurodevelopmental Impairment: A Pilot Study.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2017Article
- Restricted Ventilation Associated with Reduced Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Preterm Infants.Neonatology · 2017Article
- Comparison of Bayley-2 and Bayley-3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims on comparing Bayley Scales of infant development third (Bayley-III) and Bayley second (Bayley-II) edition with special focus on patterns in the first year of life. Fifty-five premature infants (43 with low birth weight/LBW >1,499 g and 12 with very/extremely low birth weight/VLBW/ELBW <1,500 g) aged 7 months (corrected for prematurity) were assessed with the complete Bayley-III. From this assessment, Bayley-II results were retrospectively estimated. Bayley-III results were compared to the expected mean with one-sample t-tests. The mean scores of both editions were compared with the aid of paired-sample t-tests. Pearson correlations between subscales and editions were analysed. The Bayley-III cognitive score of the study group was significantly higher than the expected mean of the standardization sample. VLBW/ELBW had significantly lower motor scores than LBW in both editions. When compared to estimated Bayley-II scores, all relevant Bayley-III scores were significantly higher (all p < .01) with highest difference (ten points) between the motor scales of both editions. There were significant correlations not only between Bayley-III cognitive and language scales but also between language and motor scales. Given the strong association between motor and cognitive behaviour in early infancy, this age-specific pattern is heightening the risk of failure to identify infants at risk for both cognitive and motor delay. Therefore, assessment of infants should comprise all subscales. Since Bayley-III probably overestimates especially motor performance in young infants, when interpreting Bayley-III scores in this age, comparison groups are highly recommended until further validation of normative data are outstanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.