Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224190›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2012

Fluorescence-based surface magnifying chromoendoscopy and optical coherence tomography endoscope.

R Andrew Wall, Jennifer K Barton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Volume Holographic Reflection Endoscope for In-Vivo Ovarian Cancer Clinical Studies.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R Andrew WallThe University of Arizona, College of Optical Sciences, 1630 E. University Boulevard, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Jennifer K Barton
University of Arizona · US

Funding

Dual-Modality System for Imaging Colon Cancer in MiceR01CA109385 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BARTON, JENNIFER KEHLET · 2004 to 2013
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109385NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A side-viewing, 2.3-mm diameter, surface magnifying chromoendoscopy-optical coherence tomography (SMC-OCT) endoscope has been designed for simultaneous, nondestructive surface fluorescence visualization and cross-sectional imaging. We apply this endoscope to in vivo examination of the mouse colon. A 30,000 element fiber bundle is combined with single mode fibers, for SMC and OCT imaging, respectively. The distal optics consist of a gradient-index lens and spacer to provide a 1× magnification at a working distance of 1.58 mm in air, necessary to image the sample through a 0.23-mm thick outer glass envelope, and an aluminized right-angle prism fixed to the distal end of the gradient-index lens assembly. The resulting 1∶1 imaging system is capable of 3.9-µm lateral and 2.3-µm axial resolution in the OCT channel, and 125-lp/mm resolution across a 0.70-mm field of view in the SMC channel. The endoscope can perform high contrast crypt visualization, molecular imaging, and cross-sectional imaging of colon microstructure.

Indexed as

ColonoscopesAnimalsColonEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisImage EnhancementMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, FluorescenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySubtraction TechniqueTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID23224190
PMCPMC3411934
OpenAlexW2144093263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.