Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23224173›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2012

Detection of novel biomarkers for ovarian cancer with an optical nanotechnology detection system enabling label-free diagnostics.

Simon Kaja, Jill D Hilgenberg, Julie L Collins, Anna A Shah, Debra Wawro, Shelby Zimmerman, Robert Magnusson, Peter Koulen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Comparative analysis between highFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon KajaUniversity of Missouri, Vision Research Center and Departments of Ophthalmology and Basic Medical Science, Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Jill D Hilgenberg
Julie L Collins
Anna A Shah
Debra Wawro
Shelby Zimmerman
Robert Magnusson
Peter Koulen
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Portable photonic sensor system as an early detection tool for ovarian cancerR43CA135960 · NCI · RESONANT SENSORS INC. · PI WEIDANZ, DEBRA WAWRO · 2009 to 2010
$302k
NCI NIH HHS R43 CA135960NCI NIH HHS R43CA135960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian carcinoma has the highest lethality rate of gynecologic tumors, largely attributed to the late-stage diagnosis of the disease. Reliable tools for both accurate diagnosis and early detection of disease onset are lacking, and presently less than 20% of ovarian cancers are detected at an early stage. Protein biomarkers that allow the discrimination of early and late stages of ovarian serous carcinomas are urgently needed as they would enable monitoring pre-symptomatic aspects of the disease, disease progression, and the efficacy of intervention therapies. We compare the absolute and relative protein levels of six protein biomarkers for ovarian cancer in five different established ovarian cancer cell lines, utilizing both quantitative immunoblot analysis and a guided-mode resonance (GMR) bioassay detection system that utilizes a label-free optical biosensor readout. The GMR sensor approach provided highly accurate, consistent, and reproducible quantification of protein biomarkers as validated by quantitative immunoblotting, as well as enhanced sensitivity, and is therefore suitable for quantification and detection of novel biomarkers for ovarian cancer. We identified fibronectin, apolipoprotein A1, and TIMP3 as potential protein biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of primary versus metastatic ovarian carcinoma. Future studies are needed to confirm the suitability of protein biomarkers tested herein in patient samples.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiosensing TechniquesEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansImmunoassayNanotechnologyNeoplasm ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityStaining and LabelingSurface Plasmon ResonanceBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23224173
PMCPMC3381041
OpenAlexW2040621160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.