Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23223940›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2013

Deconstructing Mus gemischus: advances in understanding ancestry, structure, and variation in the genome of the laboratory mouse.

John P Didion, Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Potential of Composite Cements for Wound Healing in Rats.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Interactions between host genetics and gut microbiota determine susceptibility to CNS autoimmunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Whole exome sequencing of wild-derived inbred strains of mice improves power to link phenotype and genotype.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John P DidionDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. jdidion@email.unc.edu
Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC and PERLEGEN, IncP50GM076468 · NIGMS · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI PETKOV, PETKO M · 2006 to 2015
$31.0M
An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50MH090338 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2009 to 2010
$6.0M
An Interdisciplinary program for systems genomics of complex behaviorsP50HG006582 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PARDO-MANUEL DE VILLENA, FERNANDO · 2011 to 2013
$2.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG006582NHGRI NIH HHS P50HG006582NIGMS NIH HHS GM-076468NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076468NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH090338NIMH NIH HHS P50MH090338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory mouse is an artificial construct with a complex relationship to its natural ancestors. In 2002, the mouse became the first mammalian model organism with a reference genome. Importantly, the mouse genome sequence was assembled from data on a single inbred laboratory strain, C57BL/6. Several large-scale genetic variant discovery efforts have been conducted, resulting in a catalog of tens of millions of SNPs and structural variants. High-density genotyping arrays covering a subset of those variants have been used to produce hundreds of millions of genotypes in laboratory stocks and a small number of wild mice. These landmark resources now enable us to determine relationships among laboratory mice, assign local ancestry at fine scale, resolve important controversies, and identify a new set of challenges-most importantly, the troubling scarcity of genetic data on the very natural populations from which the laboratory mouse was derived. Our aim with this review is to provide the reader with an historical context for the mouse as a model organism and to explain how practical decisions made in the past have influenced both the architecture of the laboratory mouse genome and the design and execution of current large-scale resources. We also provide examples on how the accomplishments of the past decade can be used by researchers to streamline the use of mice in their experiments and correctly interpret results. Finally, we propose future steps that will enable the mouse community to extend its successes in the decade to come.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryChromosome MappingGenetic VariationHaplotypesMicePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID23223940
PMCPMC4034049
OpenAlexW2068043818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.