Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23223527›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Microfluidic Western blotting.

Alex J Hughes, Amy E Herr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The Intriguing Landscape of Single-Cell Protein Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Single-Cell Proteomics.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cell Separations and Sorting.Analytical chemistry · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex J HughesDepartment of Bioengineering and University of California at Berkeley-University of California at San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Amy E Herr

Funding

Towards High Throughput Proteomics: A Micro/nanofluidic Framework for Blotless WDP2OD007294 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HERR, AMY ELIZABETH · 2010 to 2013
$2.5M
NIH HHS 1DP2OD007294NIH HHS DP2 OD007294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, quantitative Western blotting is a long-sought bioanalytical goal in the life sciences. To this end, we describe a Western blotting assay conducted in a single glass microchannel under purely electronic control. The μWestern blot is comprised of multiple steps: sample enrichment, protein sizing, protein immobilization (blotting), and in situ antibody probing. To validate the microfluidic assay, we apply the μWestern blot to analyses of human sera (HIV immunoreactivity) and cell lysate (NFκB). Analytical performance advances are achieved, including: short durations of 10-60 min, multiplexed analyte detection, mass sensitivity at the femtogram level, high-sensitivity 50-pM detection limits, and quantitation capability over a 3.6-log dynamic range. Performance gains are attributed to favorable transport and reaction conditions on the microscale. The multistep assay design relies on a photopatternable (blue light) and photoreactive (UV light) polyacrylamide gel. This hydrophilic polymer constitutes both a separation matrix for protein sizing and, after brief UV exposure, a protein immobilization scaffold for subsequent antibody probing of immobilized protein bands. We observe protein capture efficiencies exceeding 75% under sizing conditions. This compact microfluidic design supports demonstration of a 48-plex μWestern blot in a standard microscope slide form factor. Taken together, the μWestern blot establishes a foundation for rapid, targeted proteomics by merging exceptional specificity with the throughput advantages of multiplexing, as is relevant to a broad range of biological inquiry.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternCell ExtractsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHIV AntibodiesHumansMicrofluidicsProteinsReproducibility of ResultsCell ExtractsHIV AntibodiesProteins

Identifiers

PMID23223527
PMCPMC3535594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.