ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2012
Cry1-/- circadian rhythmicity depends on SCN intercellular coupling.
Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Analysis ofBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Circadian clock genes and insomnia: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Dissecting the complexity of local and systemic circadian communication in plants.Npj biological timing and sleep · 2024Review
- Machine learning analyses reveal circadian clock features predictive of anxiety among UK biobank participants.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Expression of the vesicular GABA transporter within neuromedin SProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- The duper mutation reveals previously unsuspected functions ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Machine learning and expression analyses reveal circadian clock features predictive of anxiety.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Analyses Reveal Circadian Features Predictive of Risk for Sleep Disturbance.Nature and science of sleep · 2022Article
- Circadian Synchrony: Sleep, Nutrition, and Physical Activity.Frontiers in network physiology · 2021Article
- CRYPTOCHROMES confer robustness, not rhythmicity, to circadian timekeeping.The EMBO journal · 2021Article
- Role of core circadian clock genes in hormone release and target tissue sensitivity in the reproductive axis.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2020Review
- Chemical modulation of circadian rhythms and assessment of cellular behavior via indirubin and derivatives.Methods in enzymology · 2020Article
- The central clock controls the daily rhythm of Aqp5 expression in salivary glands.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2018Article
- A novel photic entrainment mechanism for the circadian clock in an insect: involvement ofZoological letters · 2018Article
- Cellular circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus remain coupled in the absence of connexin-36.Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
- Animal Cryptochromes: Divergent Roles in Light Perception, Circadian Timekeeping and Beyond.Photochemistry and photobiology · 2017Review
- Collective timekeeping among cells of the master circadian clock.The Journal of endocrinology · 2016Review
- In synch but not in step: Circadian clock circuits regulating plasticity in daily rhythms.Neuroscience · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the central pacemaker organizing circadian rhythms of behavior and physiology. At the cellular level, the mammalian clock consists of autoregulatory feedback loops involving a set of "clock genes," including the Cryptochrome (Cry) genes, Cry1 and Cry2. Experimental evidence suggests that Cry1 and Cry2 play distinct roles in circadian clock function. In mice, Cry1 is required for sustained circadian rhythms in dissociated SCN neurons or fibroblasts but not in organotypic SCN slices or at the behavioral level, whereas Cry2 is not required at any of these levels. It has been argued that coupling among SCN cellular oscillators compensates for clock gene defects to preserve oscillatory function. Here we test this hypothesis in Cry1(-/-) mice by first disrupting intercellular coupling in vivo using constant light (resulting in behavioral arrhythmicity) and then examining circadian clock gene expression in SCN slices at the single cell level. In this manner, we were able to test the role of intercellular coupling without drugs and while preserving tissue organization, avoiding the confounding influences of more invasive manipulations. Cry1(-/-) mice (as well as control Cry2(-/-) mice) bearing the PER2::LUC knock-in reporter were transferred from a standard light:dark cycle to constant bright light (~650 lux) to induce arrhythmic locomotor patterns. In SCN slices from these animals, we used bioluminescence imaging to monitor PER2::LUC expression in single cells. We show that SCN slices from rhythmic Cry1(-/-) and Cry2(-/-) mice had similarly high percentages of functional single-cell oscillators. In contrast, SCN slices from arrhythmic Cry1(-/-) mice had significantly fewer rhythmic cells than SCN slices from arrhythmic Cry2(-/-) mice. Thus, constant light in vivo disrupted intercellular SCN coupling to reveal a cell-autonomous circadian defect in Cry1(-/-) cells that is normally compensated by intercellular coupling in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.