Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23223329›Full record

ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2013

Health care expenditures among Asian American subgroups.

Jie Chen, Arturo Vargas-Bustamante, Alexander N Ortega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie ChenUniversity of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. jichen@umd.edu
Arturo Vargas-Bustamante
Alexander N Ortega

Funding

Vascular function, cardiovascular disease biomarkers and the Latino paradoxP50HL105188 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KAPLAN, ROBERT M · 2010 to 2014
$9.9M
MARYLAND POPULATION RESEARCH CENTERR24HD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HOFFERTH, SANDRA L · 2001 to 2016
$6.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL105188NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using two nationally representative data sets, this study examined health care expenditure disparities between Caucasians and different Asian American subgroups. Multivariate analyses demonstrate that Asian Americans, as a group, have significantly lower total expenditures compared with Caucasians. Results also point to considerable heterogeneities in health care spending within Asian American subgroups. Findings suggest that language assistance programs would be effective in reducing disparities among Caucasians and Asian American subgroups with the exception of Indians and Filipinos, who tend to be more proficient in English. Results also indicate that citizenship and nativity were major factors associated with expenditure disparities. Socioeconomic status, however, could not explain expenditure disparities. Results also show that Asian Americans have lower physician and pharmaceutical costs but not emergency department or hospital expenditures. These findings suggest the need for culturally competent policies specific to Asian American subgroups and the necessity to encourage cost-effective treatments among Asian Americans.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsianChinaFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ExpendituresHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPhilippinesUnited StatesWhite PeopleYoung AdultAsian Americanscitizenship/nativityhealth care expenditureshealth disparitylanguage barrier

Identifiers

PMID23223329
PMCPMC3925768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.