ArticleResearch Evaluation2011
Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.
Article in Research Evaluation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation and early outcomes of a team science consultation service: Addressing key challenges in translational research collaborations.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Interpretive ethnographic studies and in-depth qualitative research should be treated as high-quality evidence in the science of team science.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The mosaic of science: Disciplinary diversity and scientific prestige in research groups in Colombia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Organizational change readiness for team science: a pathway framework for team science success.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Designing, Developing, and Evaluating a Stakeholder-Informed Mobile App to Promote Physical Activity in Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Dual career in the workplace: co-creation of a conceptual framework by employers and employee-sportspersons incorporating corporate social responsibility and brand alignment.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Team science competencies for clinical research professionals: A multileveled Delphi approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Conducting health services research during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences from the veterans health administration.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Utilizing the Un-Meeting model to advance innovative translational and team science.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Un-Meetings as tools for translational idea generation: A semantic content analysis of an Opioid Crisis Un-Meeting.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Improving the quality and quantity of clinical and translational research statewide: An application of group concept mapping.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Enhancing translational team effectiveness: The Wisconsin Interventions in Team Science framework for translating empirically informed strategies into evidence-based interventions.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- An integrative review and practical guide to team development interventions for translational science teams: One size does not fit all.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Review
- How do researchers approach societal impact?PloS one · 2021Article
- Developing and evaluating a team development intervention to support interdisciplinary teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Participatory needs assessment and action planning for a clinical and translational research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- A framework for coordination center responsibilities and performance in a multi-site, transdisciplinary public health research initiative.Research Evaluation · 2019Article
- Online, cross-disciplinary team science training for health and medical professionals: Evaluation of COALESCE (teamscience.net).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An increase in cross-disciplinary, collaborative team science initiatives over the last few decades has spurred interest by multiple stakeholder groups in empirical research on scientific teams, giving rise to an emergent field referred to as the science of team science (SciTS). This study employed a collaborative team science concept-mapping evaluation methodology to develop a comprehensive research agenda for the SciTS field. Its integrative mixed-methods approach combined group process with statistical analysis to derive a conceptual framework that identifies research areas of team science and their relative importance to the emerging SciTS field. The findings from this concept-mapping project constitute a lever for moving SciTS forward at theoretical, empirical, and translational levels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.