Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23222843›Full record

ArticleNursing research

The work of adult and pediatric intensive care unit nurses.

Stephen Douglas, Randi Cartmill, Roger Brown, Peter Hoonakker, Jason Slagle, Kara Schultz Van Roy, James M Walker, Matthew Weinger, Tosha Wetterneck, Pascale Carayon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Job performance in healthcare: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying Barriers to Nurse-Facilitated Patient Mobility in the Intensive Care Unit.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ICU nurses and physicians dialogue regarding patients clinical status and care options-a focus group study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. How Do Residents Spend Their Time in the Intensive Care Unit?The American journal of the medical sciences · 2015
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Macroergonomics in Healthcare Quality and Patient Safety.Review of human factors and ergonomics · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephen DouglasUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI 53792, USA. sdouglas@uwhealth.org
Randi Cartmill
Roger Brown
Peter Hoonakker
Jason Slagle
Kara Schultz Van Roy
James M Walker
Matthew Weinger
Tosha Wetterneck
Pascale Carayon

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers have used various methods to describe and quantify the work of nurses. Many of these studies were focused on nursing in general care settings; therefore, less is known about the unique work nurses perform in intensive care units (ICUs).

objectivesThe aim of this study was to observe adult and pediatric ICU nurses in order to quantify and compare the duration and frequency of nursing tasks across four ICUs as well as within two discrete workflows: nurse handoffs at shift change and patient interdisciplinary rounds.

methodsA behavioral task analysis of adult and pediatric nurses was used to allow unobtrusive, real-time observation. A total of 147 hours of observation were conducted in an adult medical-surgical, a cardiac, a pediatric, and a neonatal ICU at one rural, tertiary care community teaching hospital.

resultsOver 75% of ICU nurses' time was spent on patient care activities. Approximately 50% of this time was spent on direct patient care, over 20% on care coordination, 28% on nonpatient care, and approximately 2% on indirect patient care activities. Variations were observed between units; for example, nurses in the two adult units spent more time using monitors and devices. A high rate and variety of tasks were also observed: Nurses performed about 125 activities per hour, averaging a switch between tasks every 29 seconds. DISCUSSION: This study provides useful information about how nurses spend their time in various ICUs. The methodology can be used in future research to examine changes in work related to, for example, implementation of health information technology.

Indexed as

Critical CareNurse's RoleWorkloadAdultChildHospitals, TeachingHumansIntensive Care UnitsNursing Staff, HospitalTime and Motion StudiesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID23222843
PMCPMC5890532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.