Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23222369›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2013

Inclusion of chemotherapy in addition to anthracycline in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia does not improve outcomes: results of the MRC AML15 trial.

A K Burnett, R K Hills, D Grimwade, J V Jovanovic, J Craig, M F McMullin, J Kell, K Wheatley, J A L Yin, A Hunter and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Arsenic trioxide replacing or reducing chemotherapy in consolidation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL2012 trial).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. [How I treat PML-RARα positive actue promyelocytic leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical impact ofBlood advances · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

A K BurnettDepartment of Haematology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. BurnettAK@cf.ac.uk
R K Hills
D Grimwade
J V Jovanovic
J Craig
M F McMullin
J Kell
K Wheatley
J A L Yin
A Hunter
D Milligan
N H Russell
United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Subgroup
Cardiff University · GBKing's College School · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J006742/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two hundred eighty-five patients, median age 42, with PML-RARα-positive acute promyelocytic leukaemia were randomised to Ara-C-containing 'Medical Research Council (MRC) Chemotherapy'+ATRA (All-trans-retinoic acid) or anthracycline+ATRA (modified 'Spanish') therapy. MRC treatment comprised four courses with ATRA in courses 1-2. Spanish treatment comprised four anthracycline-based courses with ATRA in courses 1-3. In course 3 patients were randomised to gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) or not. The Spanish arm received 24-month maintenance. Patients were sequentially molecularly monitored. Quality of life was assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 months. Remission rates were similar in both arms (93%): cumulative incidence of haematological relapse (CIHR) was 6% at 5 years; 5 patients relapsed molecularly. Survival post relapse was 80%. There were more deaths in remission in the MRC arm (4% vs 10%: P=0.2). The overall 5-year relapse-free and overall survival was similar between arms (81% vs 82% and 84% vs 83%, respectively). More supportive care and hospitalisation (81.8 vs 63 days, P<0.0001) was required in the MRC arm. GO did not provide benefit. High white blood cell count (>10 × 10(9)/l) was not prognostic overall, or within treatment arms. Both approaches deliver similar results with minor differences in quality of life. MRC treatment required more hospitalisation. This suggests that additional chemotherapy, Ara-C in particular, is not required.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeukemia, Promyelocytic, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclines

Identifiers

PMID23222369
OpenAlexW1996750522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.