Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23222300›Full record

ReviewCancer research2012

Cytokine stimulation of epithelial cancer cells: the similar and divergent functions of IL-4 and IL-13.

Miranda A Hallett, Katherine T Venmar, Barbara Fingleton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miranda A HallettDepartment of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Katherine T Venmar
Barbara Fingleton

Funding

Integrated Biological Systems Training in OncologyT32CA119925 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Vivian Gama, William Patrick Tansey · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CELLULAR, BIOCHEMICAL, &MOLECULAR ST32GM008554 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PATTON, JAMES G. · 1995 to 2020
$7.4M
Epithelial IL4Ralpha Regulates Colon Tumor ProgressionR01CA157781 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FINGLETON, BARBARA · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA157781NCI NIH HHS T32 CA119925NCI NIH HHS T32CA119925NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008554NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Th2 cytokines interleukin (IL)-4 and -13 are acknowledged regulators of lymphocyte proliferation and activation. They have also been well studied in the regulation of various myeloid-derived populations in tumor biology. It has become clear, however, that both cytokines can have direct effects on epithelial tumor cells expressing appropriate receptors. Changes in tumor proliferation, survival, and metastatic capability have all been ascribed to IL-4 and/or IL-13 action. Here, we evaluate the evidence to support direct tumor-promoting roles of these cytokines. We also identify the questions that should be addressed before proceeding with therapeutic approaches based on neutralization of IL-4 or IL-13 pathways.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesEpithelial CellsHumansInterleukin-13Interleukin-4Models, BiologicalNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialReceptors, Interleukin-13Receptors, Interleukin-4Stimulation, ChemicalCytokinesInterleukin-13Interleukin-4Receptors, Interleukin-13Receptors, Interleukin-4

Identifiers

PMID23222300
PMCPMC3531868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.