Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23222169›Full record

ReviewBioengineered

Naturally selecting solutions: the use of genetic algorithms in bioinformatics.

Timmy Manning, Roy D Sleator, Paul Walsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineered. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A beginner's guide to phylogenetics.Microbial ecology · 2013
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timmy ManningDepartment of Computer Science; Cork Institute of Technology; Cork, Ireland; Department of Biological Sciences; Cork Institute of Technology; Cork, Ireland.
Roy D Sleator
Paul Walsh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For decades, computer scientists have looked to nature for biologically inspired solutions to computational problems; ranging from robotic control to scheduling optimization. Paradoxically, as we move deeper into the post-genomics era, the reverse is occurring, as biologists and bioinformaticians look to computational techniques, to solve a variety of biological problems. One of the most common biologically inspired techniques are genetic algorithms (GAs), which take the Darwinian concept of natural selection as the driving force behind systems for solving real world problems, including those in the bioinformatics domain. Herein, we provide an overview of genetic algorithms and survey some of the most recent applications of this approach to bioinformatics based problems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticComputational BiologyComputer SimulationCrossing Over, GeneticGenetic FitnessGenotypePhenotypeSequence Alignmentgenetic algorithmmultiple sequence alignmentoptimizationprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID23222169
PMCPMC3813526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.