Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23221766›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2013

HIV among persons incarcerated in the USA: a review of evolving concepts in testing, treatment, and linkage to community care.

Ryan P Westergaard, Anne C Spaulding, Timothy P Flanigan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan P WestergaardDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Anne C Spaulding
Timothy P Flanigan
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USProvidence College · US

Funding

Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Nutrition and Metabolism CoreP30DA013868 · NIDA · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI WANKE, CHRISTINE A · 2002 to 2012
$10.0M
Barriers to Effective HIV Care for Injection Drug Users After Release from PrisonK23DA032306 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2012 to 2016
$975k
NIAID NIH HHS P30AI050409NIAID NIH HHS P30AI42853NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032306NIDA NIH HHS K23DA032306NIDA NIH HHS P30DA013868PHS HHS H97HA08535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPeople who are incarcerated have a disproportionately high risk of HIV infection. They also tend to have risk factors associated with underutilization of antiretroviral therapy (ART) such as substance abuse, mental illness, and poor access to care. In this review, we describe how incarceration is a marker of vulnerability for suboptimal HIV care, and also how criminal justice settings may be leveraged as a platform for promoting testing, linkage, and retention in HIV care for a high-risk, marginalized population. RECENT

findingsIn both prisons and jails, routine, opt-out HIV testing strategies are more appropriate for screening correctional populations than traditional, risk-based strategies. Rapid HIV testing is feasible and acceptable in busy, urban jail settings. Although ART is successfully administered in many prison settings, release to the community is strongly associated with inconsistent access to medications and other structural factors leading to loss of viral suppression. SUMMARY: Collaborations among HIV clinicians, criminal justice personnel, and public health practitioners represent an important strategy for turning the tide on the HIV epidemic. Success will depend upon scaled-up efforts to seek individuals with undiagnosed infection and bring those who are out-of-care into long-term treatment.

Indexed as

PrisonersAnti-Retroviral AgentsCommunity Health ServicesContinuity of Patient CareHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningMedication AdherencePrisonsUnited StatesAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID23221766
PMCPMC3682655
OpenAlexW2111804185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.