Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23221406›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

A model of cholinergic modulation in olfactory bulb and piriform cortex.

Licurgo de Almeida, Marco Idiart, Christiane Linster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reciprocal relationships between sleep and smell.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Licurgo de AlmeidaDept. of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Marco Idiart
Christiane Linster
Cornell University · USUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

CRCNS: Cholinergic regulation of sensory computationR01DC009948 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS 1R01 DC-009948-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we investigate in a computational model how cholinergic inputs to the olfactory bulb (OB) and piriform cortex (PC) modulate odor representations. We use experimental data derived from different physiological studies of ACh modulation of the bulbar and cortical circuitry and the interaction between these two areas. The results presented here indicate that cholinergic modulation in the OB significantly increases contrast and synchronization in mitral cell output. Each of these effects is derived from distinct neuronal interactions, with different groups of interneurons playing different roles. Both bulbar modulation effects contribute to more stable learned representations in PC, with pyramidal networks trained with cholinergic-modulated inputs from the bulb exhibiting more robust learning than those trained with unmodulated bulbar inputs. This increased robustness is evidenced as better recovery of memories from corrupted patterns and lower-concentration inputs as well as increased memory capacity.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAcetylcholineAction PotentialsAnimalsCholinergic NeuronsInterneuronsNerve NetOlfactory BulbOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPyramidal CellsAcetylcholine

Identifiers

PMID23221406
PMCPMC3602836
OpenAlexW2046596175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.