Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23221299›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012

Targeted journal curation as a method to improve data currency at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.

Allan Peter Davis, Robin J Johnson, Kelley Lennon-Hopkins, Daniela Sciaky, Michael C Rosenstein, Thomas C Wiegers, Carolyn J Mattingly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chemical-Induced Phenotypes at CTD Help Inform the Predisease State and Construct Adverse Outcome Pathways.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allan Peter DavisDepartment of Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7617, USA. apdavis3@ncsu.edu
Robin J Johnson
Kelley Lennon-Hopkins
Daniela Sciaky
Michael C Rosenstein
Thomas C Wiegers
Carolyn J Mattingly

Funding

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)R01ES014065 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DAVIS, ALLAN PETER, MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2006 to 2021
$10.5M
Generation of a centralized and integrated resource for exposure dataR01ES019604 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2011 to 2015
$1.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014065NIEHS NIH HHS R01-ES014065NIEHS NIH HHS R01-ES019604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) is a public resource that promotes understanding about the effects of environmental chemicals on human health. CTD biocurators read the scientific literature and manually curate a triad of chemical-gene, chemical-disease and gene-disease interactions. Typically, articles for CTD are selected using a chemical-centric approach by querying PubMed to retrieve a corpus containing the chemical of interest. Although this technique ensures adequate coverage of knowledge about the chemical (i.e. data completeness), it does not necessarily reflect the most current state of all toxicological research in the community at large (i.e. data currency). Keeping databases current with the most recent scientific results, as well as providing a rich historical background from legacy articles, is a challenging process. To address this issue of data currency, CTD designed and tested a journal-centric approach of curation to complement our chemical-centric method. We first identified priority journals based on defined criteria. Next, over 7 weeks, three biocurators reviewed 2425 articles from three consecutive years (2009-2011) of three targeted journals. From this corpus, 1252 articles contained relevant data for CTD and 52 752 interactions were manually curated. Here, we describe our journal selection process, two methods of document delivery for the biocurators and the analysis of the resulting curation metrics, including data currency, and both intra-journal and inter-journal comparisons of research topics. Based on our results, we expect that curation by select journals can (i) be easily incorporated into the curation pipeline to complement our chemical-centric approach; (ii) build content more evenly for chemicals, genes and diseases in CTD (rather than biasing data by chemicals-of-interest); (iii) reflect developing areas in environmental health and (iv) improve overall data currency for chemicals, genes and diseases. Database URL: http://ctdbase.org/

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticPeriodicals as TopicToxicogeneticsData MiningEnvironmental HealthGenesHumansMolecular Sequence Annotation

Identifiers

PMID23221299
PMCPMC3515863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.