Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23221174›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012

The eFIP system for text mining of protein interaction networks of phosphorylated proteins.

Catalina O Tudor, Cecilia N Arighi, Qinghua Wang, Cathy H Wu, K Vijay-Shanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. iTextMine: integrated text-mining system for large-scale knowledge extraction from the literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pressing needs of biomedical text mining in biocuration and beyond: opportunities and challenges.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  6. Text Mining for Protein Docking.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An overview of the BioCreative 2012 Workshop Track III: interactive text mining task.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. BioC: a minimalist approach to interoperability for biomedical text processing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catalina O TudorDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, USA.
Cecilia N Arighi
Qinghua Wang
Cathy H Wu
K Vijay-Shanker

Funding

PRO: A Protein Ontology in Open Biomedical OntologiesR01GM080646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2007 to 2018
$8.9M
Linking Text Mining and Data Mining for Biomedical Knowledge DiscoveryG08LM010720 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI WU, CATHY H. · 2010 to 2012
$438k
NIGMS NIH HHS 5R01GM080646-06NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080646NLM NIH HHS 5G08LM010720-02NLM NIH HHS G08 LM010720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is a central regulatory mechanism in signal transduction involved in most biological processes. Phosphorylation of a protein may lead to activation or repression of its activity, alternative subcellular location and interaction with different binding partners. Extracting this type of information from scientific literature is critical for connecting phosphorylated proteins with kinases and interaction partners, along with their functional outcomes, for knowledge discovery from phosphorylation protein networks. We have developed the Extracting Functional Impact of Phosphorylation (eFIP) text mining system, which combines several natural language processing techniques to find relevant abstracts mentioning phosphorylation of a given protein together with indications of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and potential evidences for impact of phosphorylation on the PPIs. eFIP integrates our previously developed tools, Extracting Gene Related ABstracts (eGRAB) for document retrieval and name disambiguation, Rule-based LIterature Mining System (RLIMS-P) for Protein Phosphorylation for extraction of phosphorylation information, a PPI module to detect PPIs involving phosphorylated proteins and an impact module for relation extraction. The text mining system has been integrated into the curation workflow of the Protein Ontology (PRO) to capture knowledge about phosphorylated proteins. The eFIP web interface accepts gene/protein names or identifiers, or PubMed identifiers as input, and displays results as a ranked list of abstracts with sentence evidence and summary table, which can be exported in a spreadsheet upon result validation. As a participant in the BioCreative-2012 Interactive Text Mining track, the performance of eFIP was evaluated on document retrieval (F-measures of 78-100%), sentence-level information extraction (F-measures of 70-80%) and document ranking (normalized discounted cumulative gain measures of 93-100% and mean average precision of 0.86). The utility and usability of the eFIP web interface were also evaluated during the BioCreative Workshop. The use of the eFIP interface provided a significant speed-up (∼2.5-fold) for time to completion of the curation task. Additionally, eFIP significantly simplifies the task of finding relevant articles on PPI involving phosphorylated forms of a given protein.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein Interaction MapsAbstracting and Indexingbcl-Associated Death ProteinData MiningDocumentationMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationbcl-Associated Death ProteinPhosphoproteins

Identifiers

PMID23221174
PMCPMC3514748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.