Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23220694›Full record

ArticlePlant & cell physiology2013

The plant ontology as a tool for comparative plant anatomy and genomic analyses.

Laurel Cooper, Ramona L Walls, Justin Elser, Maria A Gandolfo, Dennis W Stevenson, Barry Smith, Justin Preece, Balaji Athreya, Christopher J Mungall, Stefan Rensing and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant & cell physiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automated annotation of scientific texts for ML-based keyphrase extraction and validation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Sainfoin (Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Laurel CooperDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 2082 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-2902, USA.
Ramona L Walls
Justin Elser
Maria A Gandolfo
Dennis W Stevenson
Barry Smith
Justin Preece
Balaji Athreya
Christopher J Mungall
Stefan Rensing
Manuel Hiss
Daniel Lang
Ralf Reski
Tanya Z Berardini
Donghui Li
Eva Huala
Mary Schaeffer
Naama Menda
Elizabeth Arnaud
Rosemary Shrestha
Yukiko Yamazaki
Pankaj Jaiswal

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Plant Ontology (PO; http://www.plantontology.org/) is a publicly available, collaborative effort to develop and maintain a controlled, structured vocabulary ('ontology') of terms to describe plant anatomy, morphology and the stages of plant development. The goals of the PO are to link (annotate) gene expression and phenotype data to plant structures and stages of plant development, using the data model adopted by the Gene Ontology. From its original design covering only rice, maize and Arabidopsis, the scope of the PO has been expanded to include all green plants. The PO was the first multispecies anatomy ontology developed for the annotation of genes and phenotypes. Also, to our knowledge, it was one of the first biological ontologies that provides translations (via synonyms) in non-English languages such as Japanese and Spanish. As of Release #18 (July 2012), there are about 2.2 million annotations linking PO terms to >110,000 unique data objects representing genes or gene models, proteins, RNAs, germplasm and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) from 22 plant species. In this paper, we focus on the plant anatomical entity branch of the PO, describing the organizing principles, resources available to users and examples of how the PO is integrated into other plant genomics databases and web portals. We also provide two examples of comparative analyses, demonstrating how the ontology structure and PO-annotated data can be used to discover the patterns of expression of the LEAFY (LFY) and terpene synthase (TPS) gene homologs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantSoftwareAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesDatabases, GeneticFlowersGenomicsInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyPhenotypePlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlantsAlkyl and Aryl TransferasesPlant Proteinsterpene synthase

Identifiers

PMID23220694
PMCPMC3583023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.