ReviewVaccine2013
Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: experience in the United States and implications for a potential group B streptococcal vaccine.
Review in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
132 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 300 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating prenatal and perinatal factors on meconium microbiota: a systematic review and cohort study.Pediatric research · 2024Pooled it
- Are maternal vaccines effective and safe for mothers and infants? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ global health · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Strategies for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Infection in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intrapartum Antibiotic Chemoprophylaxis Policies for the Prevention of Group B Streptococcal Disease Worldwide: Systematic Review.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Pooled it
- Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease With Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Pooled it
- Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Maternal 6-valent group B Streptococcus vaccine in non-pregnant and pregnant females: a randomized phase 1/2 trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Association between intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus colonization and clinical chorioamnionitis among patients undergoing induction of labor at term.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Trial
- Safety and Immunogenicity of a Second Dose of an Investigational Maternal Trivalent Group B Streptococcus Vaccine in Nonpregnant Women 4-6 Years After a First Dose: Results From a Phase 2 Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Trial
- Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Oral azithromycin given during labour decreases bacterial carriage in the mothers and their offspring: a double-blind randomized trial.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2016Trial
- Prevention of bacterial infections in the newborn by pre-delivery administration of azithromycin: Study protocol of a randomized efficacy trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Trial
- Vaccinations During Pregnancy Protect the Mother-Infant Dyad and Are Generally Safe.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Review
- Article
- Time to rethink prevention of neonatal group B streptococcal disease.Seminars in immunopathology · 2026Review
- Antibiotic stewardship in the context of management of early onset neonatal sepsis-an evolving paradigm shift.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Descriptive review: global spectrum of invasive group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults: epidemiology, risk factors and clinical presentations.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Clinical and Epidemiological Landscape of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovative epitope-based ELISA assay for detecting Group B Streptococcus carriage in pregnant women.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) emerged as the leading cause of newborn infection in the United States in the 1970s. In the 1980s clinical trials demonstrated that giving intrapartum intravenous ampicillin or penicillin to mothers at risk was highly effective at preventing invasive GBS disease in the first week of life (early-onset). In 1996, the first national guidelines for the prevention of perinatal GBS disease were issued; these recommended either antenatal screening for GBS colonization and intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis (IAP) to colonized women, or targeting IAP to women with certain obstetric risk factors during labor. In 2002, revised guidelines recommended universal antenatal GBS screening. A multistate population-based review of labor and delivery records in 2003-2004 found 85% of women had documented antenatal GBS screening; 98% of screened women had a colonization result available at labor. However, missed opportunities for prevention were identified among women delivering preterm and among those with penicillin allergy, and more false negative GBS screening results were observed than expected. The incidence of invasive early-onset GBS disease decreased by more than 80% from 1.8 cases/1000 live births in the early 1990s to 0.26 cases/1000 live births in 2010; from 1994 to 2010 we estimate that over 70,000 cases of EOGBS invasive disease were prevented in the United States. IAP effectiveness is similar and high among term (91%) and preterm (86%) infants when first line therapy is received for at least 4h. However, early-onset disease incidence among preterm infants remains twice that of term infants; moreover disease among infants after the first week of life (late-onset disease) has not been impacted by IAP. The US experience demonstrates that universal screening and IAP for GBS-colonized women comprise a highly effective strategy against early-onset GBS infections. Maximizing adherence to recommended practices holds promise to further reduce the burden of early-onset GBS disease. Yet there are also inherent limitations to universal screening and IAP. Some of these could potentially be addressed by an efficacious maternal GBS vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.