Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23218997›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2013

Biomarkers after risk stratification in acute chest pain (from the BRIC Study).

Shiny Mathewkutty, Sanjum S Sethi, Ashish Aneja, Kshitij Shah, Rupa L Iyengar, Luke Hermann, Sayyar Khakimov, Louai Razzouk, Ricardo Esquitin, Rajesh Vedanthan and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Shiny MathewkuttyZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Sanjum S Sethi
Ashish Aneja
Kshitij Shah
Rupa L Iyengar
Luke Hermann
Sayyar Khakimov
Louai Razzouk
Ricardo Esquitin
Rajesh Vedanthan
Terrie-Ann Benjamin
Marie Grace
Rosane Nisenbaum
Krishnan Ramanathan
Lakshmi Ramanathan
James Chesebro
Michael E Farkouh
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · USJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · USNew York University · USSt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Nurse Management of Hypertension in Rural Western KenyaK01TW009218 · FIC · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI VEDANTHAN, RAJESH · 2011 to 2015
$638k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW009218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current models incompletely risk-stratify patients with acute chest pain. In this study, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cystatin C were incorporated into a contemporary chest pain triage algorithm in a clinically stratified population to improve acute coronary syndrome discrimination. Adult patients with chest pain presenting without myocardial infarction (n = 382) were prospectively enrolled from 2008 to 2009. After clinical risk stratification, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cystatin C were measured and standard care was performed. The primary end point was the result of a clinical stress test. The secondary end point was any major adverse cardiac event at 6 months. Associations were determined through multivariate stratified analyses. In the low-risk group, 76 of 78 patients with normal levels of the 2 biomarkers had normal stress test results (negative predictive value 97%). Normal biomarkers predicted normal stress test results with an odds ratio of 10.56 (p = 0.006). In contrast, 26 of 33 intermediate-risk patients with normal levels of the 2 biomarkers had normal stress test results (negative predictive value 79%). Biomarkers and stress test results were not associated in the intermediate-risk group (odds ratio 2.48, p = 0.09). There were 42 major adverse cardiac events in the overall cohort. No major adverse cardiac events occurred at 6 months in the low-risk subgroup that underwent stress testing. In conclusion, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and cystatin C levels predict the results of stress tests in low-risk patients with chest pain but should not be substituted for stress testing in intermediate-risk patients. There is potential for their use in the early discharge of low-risk patients after clinical risk stratification.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTriageAcute PainBiomarkersChest PainCystatin CDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsBiomarkersCystatin CNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Protein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID23218997
PMCPMC4362688
OpenAlexW2049109492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.