ArticleSurgery2013
Informed consent for innovative surgery: a survey of patients and surgeons.
Article in Surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The ethical landscape of robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Patients' perceptions of ethical issues in semi-autonomous robot-assisted surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- CORR Insights®: What Is the Clinical Efficacy of Combined Semitendinosus Autograft Reconstruction and Scar Tissue Repair for Chronic Irreparable Patellar Tendon Rupture?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Precarious hope: Ethical considerations for offering experimental fetal therapies outside of research after initial studies in humans.Prenatal diagnosis · 2024Article
- Operating Ethically: A Review of Surgical Ethics in Pakistan and Recommendations for the Way Forward.Cureus · 2023Review
- Surgical innovation in ophthalmology: challenges and opportunities.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Ethical and Psychosocial Factors in the Decision-Making and Informed Consent Process for Upper Extremity Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Mixed-Methods Study.Transplantation direct · 2023Article
- Article
- Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons' and governance representatives' views.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Initiating a Robotic Thyroidectomy Program in India.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2018Article
- Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2016Article
- How much information do patients want or need.World journal of surgery · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnlike new drugs and medical devices, most surgical procedures are developed outside clinical trials and without regulatory oversight. Surgical professional organizations have discussed how new procedures should be introduced into practice without agreement on what topics informed consent discussions must include. To provide surgeons with more specific guidance, we wanted to determine what information patients and surgeons consider essential to disclose before an innovative surgical procedure.
methodsOf those approached, 85 of 113 attending surgeons and 383 of 541 adult postoperative patients completed surveys; responses to the surveys were 75% and 71%, respectively. Using a 6-point Likert scale, participants rated the importance of discussing 16 types of information preoperatively for 3 techniques (standard open, laparoscopic, robotic) offered for a hypothetic partial hepatectomy.
resultsCompared with surgeons, patients placed more importance on nearly all types of information, particularly volumes and outcomes. For all 3 techniques, approximately 80% of patients indicated that they could not decide on surgery without being told whether it would be the surgeon's first time doing the procedure. When considering an innovative robotic surgery, a clear majority of both patients and surgeons agreed that it was essential to disclose the novel nature of the procedure, potentially unknown risks and benefits, and whether it would be the surgeon's first time performing the procedure.
conclusionTo promote informed decision-making and autonomy among patients considering innovative surgery, surgeons should disclose the novel nature of the procedure, potentially unknown risks and benefits, and whether the surgeon would be performing the procedure for the first time. When accurate volumes and outcomes data are available, surgeons should also discuss these with patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.