Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23217636›Full record

Trial reportInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2012

Complications in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with silk stents: an analysis of 30 consecutive patients.

L Cirillo, M Leonardi, M Dall'olio, C Princiotta, A Stafa, L Simonetti, F Toni, R Agati

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of recanalized intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Two-stage reconstructive overlapping stent LEO+ and SILK for treatment of intracranial circumferential fusiform aneurysms in the posterior circulation.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Errors in neuroradiology.La Radiologia medica · 2015
    Review
  13. Treatment of vertebrobasilar fusiform aneurysms with Pipeline embolization device.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2015
    Article
  14. Long-term occlusion results with SILK flow diversion in 28 aneurysms: Do recanalizations occur during follow-up?Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the flow diverter era: frequency of use and results in a consecutive series of 550 treatments in a single centre.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L CirilloNeuroradiology Department, IRCCS of Neurological Sciences, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy.
M Leonardi
M Dall'olio
C Princiotta
A Stafa
L Simonetti
F Toni
R Agati
University of Bologna · ITInstitute of Neurological Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow-diverting stents (Silk and PED) have radically changed the approach to intracranial aneurysm treatment from the use of endosaccular materials to use of an extraaneurysmal endoluminal device. However, much debate surrounds the most appropriate indications for the use of FD stents and the problems raised by several possible complications.We analysed our technical difficulties and the early (less than ten days after treatment) and late complications encountered in 30 aneurysms treated comprising 13 giant lesions, 12 large, five with maximum diameters <10 mm and one blister-like aneurysm. In our experience the primary indications for the use of FD stents can be the symptomatic intracavernous giant aneurysms. Although the extracavernous carotid siphon aneurysms have major risk of bleeding, FD stents are indicated clearly explaining the risks to the patient in case of severe mass effect. There is a very complex assessment for aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar circulation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral AngiographyEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSilkStentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeSilk

Identifiers

PMID23217636
PMCPMC3520555
OpenAlexW1589184931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.