Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23217166›Full record

ArticleMobile DNA2012

The Mu story: how a maverick phage moved the field forward.

Rasika M Harshey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mobile DNA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Prophages in marineISME communications · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prophage-Derived Regions inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Structure and function of retroviral integrase.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Bacteriophage Technology and Modern Medicine.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Retroviral DNA Integration.Chemical reviews · 2016
    Review
  19. DNA Transposition at Work.Chemical reviews · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rasika M HarsheySection of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. rasika@uts.cc.utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

STUDIES ON BACTERIOPHAGE MU DNA TRANSPOSITIONR01GM033247 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HARSHEY, RASIKA M · 1985 to 2013
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article traces the pioneering contributions of phage Mu to our current knowledge of how movable elements move/transpose. Mu provided the first molecular evidence of insertion elements in E. coli, postulated by McClintock to control gene activity in maize in the pre-DNA era. An early Mu-based model successfully explained all the DNA rearrangements associated with transposition, providing a blueprint for navigating the deluge of accumulating reports on transposable element activity. Amplification of the Mu genome via transposition meant that its transposition frequencies were orders of magnitude greater than any rival, so it was only natural that the first in vitro system for transposition was established for Mu. These experiments unraveled the chemistry of the phosphoryl transfer reaction of transposition, and shed light on the nucleoprotein complexes within which they occur. They hastened a similar analysis of other transposons and ushered in the structural era where many transpososomes were crystallized. While it was a lucky break that the mechanism of HIV DNA integration turned out to be similar to that of Mu, it is no accident that current drugs for HIV integrase inhibitors owe their discovery to trailblazing experiments done with Mu. Shining the light on how movable elements restructure genomes, Mu has also given of itself generously to understanding the genome.

Identifiers

PMID23217166
PMCPMC3562280
OpenAlexW2119450302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.