Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23216909›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

Hydra: a scalable proteomic search engine which utilizes the Hadoop distributed computing framework.

Steven Lewis, Attila Csordas, Sarah Killcoyne, Henning Hermjakob, Michael R Hoopmann, Robert L Moritz, Eric W Deutsch, John Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cloud Computing Enabled Big Multi-Omics Data Analytics.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Deep Learning-based MSMS Spectra Reduction in Support of Running Multiple Protein Search Engines on Cloud.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2017
    Article
  4. Single-cell Transcriptome Study as Big Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2016
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steven LewisInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA. steven.lewis@systemsbiology.org
Attila Csordas
Sarah Killcoyne
Henning Hermjakob
Michael R Hoopmann
Robert L Moritz
Eric W Deutsch
John Boyle

Funding

Quantitative Systems BiologyP50GM076547 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BALIGA, NITIN S · 2006 to 2016
$30.6M
Shortening the development cycle time of Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools with high performance computingR01GM087221 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2010 to 2021
$6.0M
Complete Human Peptide- and MRM-AtlasRC2HG005805 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HOOD, LEROY E, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2009 to 2010
$4.6M
Providing Peptide Atlas Based Services through the caGRID infrastructureR01CA137442 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI BOYLE, JOHN · 2009 to 2011
$745k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA137442NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005805NHGRI NIH HHS RC2 HG005805NIGMS NIH HHS 2P50 GM076547NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076547NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM087221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor shotgun mass spectrometry based proteomics the most computationally expensive step is in matching the spectra against an increasingly large database of sequences and their post-translational modifications with known masses. Each mass spectrometer can generate data at an astonishingly high rate, and the scope of what is searched for is continually increasing. Therefore solutions for improving our ability to perform these searches are needed.

resultsWe present a sequence database search engine that is specifically designed to run efficiently on the Hadoop MapReduce distributed computing framework. The search engine implements the K-score algorithm, generating comparable output for the same input files as the original implementation. The scalability of the system is shown, and the architecture required for the development of such distributed processing is discussed.

conclusionThe software is scalable in its ability to handle a large peptide database, numerous modifications and large numbers of spectra. Performance scales with the number of processors in the cluster, allowing throughput to expand with the available resources.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSearch EngineSoftwareDatabases, FactualMass SpectrometryPeptidesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsSequence Analysis, ProteinPeptides

Identifiers

PMID23216909
PMCPMC3538679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.