Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23216674›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2012

Comparative injection-site pain and tolerability of subcutaneous serum-free formulation of interferonβ-1a versus subcutaneous interferonβ-1b: results of the randomized, multicenter, Phase IIIb REFORMS study.

Barry Singer, Daniel Bandari, Mark Cascione, Christopher LaGanke, John Huddlestone, Randy Bennett, Fernando Dangond, REFORMS Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00428584 (A Randomized, Multicenter, Two Arm, Open Label, Twelve Week Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Rebif), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00428584 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Multicenter, Two Arm, Open Label, Twelve Week Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Rebif (New Formulation) (IFN Beta-1a) and Betaseron (IFN Beta-1b) in IFN-naive Subjects With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) Followed by a Single Arm, Eighty-two Week Minimum, Rebif (New Formulation) Only Safety Extension

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD SeronoRan2006 to 2009Enrolled129ConditionsRelapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)ArmsNew Formulation of rebif - human interferon beta-1a, Interferon beta -1b
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barry SingerMissouri Baptist Medical Center, St, Louis, MO, USA. bnvsinger@earthlink.net
Daniel Bandari
Mark Cascione
Christopher LaGanke
John Huddlestone
Randy Bennett
Fernando Dangond
REFORMS Study Group
Missouri Baptist Medical Center · USMultiCare Health System · USOno Pharmaceutical (United States) · USUrology Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN)β-1a and IFNβ-1b have been shown to reduce relapse rates. A formulation of IFNβ-1a has been produced without fetal bovine serum and without human serum albumin as an excipient (not currently approved for use in the US). The objectives of this study were to evaluate tolerability, injection-site redness, subject-reported satisfaction with therapy, and clinical safety and efficacy of the serum-free formulation of IFNβ-1a versus IFNβ-1b in IFNβ-treatment-naïve patients with RRMS. The objectives of the extension phase were to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of IFNβ-1a.

methodsThis randomized, parallel-group, open-label study was conducted at 27 clinical sites in the US. Eligible patients aged 18-60 years were randomized to receive either IFNβ-1a, titrated to 44 μg sc three times weekly (tiw) (n = 65), or IFNβ-1b, titrated to 250 μg sc every other day (n = 64) over 12 weeks. Following this, all patients received IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw for 82-112 weeks. Primary endpoint was mean change in patient-reported pain, as assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) diary pain score (from 0 mm [no pain] to 100 mm [worst possible pain]) at the injection site, from pre-injection to 30 min post-injection over the first 21 full-dose injections. Secondary assessments included proportion of patients pain-free as recorded by VAS diary and the Short-Form McGill Pain questionnaire VAS.

resultsA total of 129 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Mean (standard deviation) change in VAS diary pain score was not significantly different between groups, although numerically lower with IFNβ-1a versus IFNβ-1b from pre-injection to immediately post-injection (1.46 [2.93] vs. 4.63 [10.57] mm), 10 min post-injection (0.70 [1.89] vs. 1.89 [5.75] mm), and 30 min post-injection (0.67 [2.32] vs. 1.14 [4.94] mm). Proportion of patients pain-free at all time periods post-injection was also not significantly different between groups. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of these treatments.

conclusionsIn IFNβ-treatment-naïve patients with RRMS, both the serum-free formulation of IFNβ-1a and IFNβ-1b treatments were generally accompanied by low-level injection-site pain and were well tolerated.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00428584.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1aInterferon beta-1bMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingPainPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1aInterferon beta-1b

Identifiers

PMID23216674
PMCPMC3541262
OpenAlexW2108199825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.