Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23215710›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2013

Rationale and design of the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study.

Marleen M H J van Gelder, Reini W Bretveld, Jolt Roukema, Morac Steenhoek, Joris van Drongelen, Marc E A Spaanderman, Dick van Rumpt, Gerhard A Zielhuis, Chris M Verhaak, Nel Roeleveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effects of maternal education on maternal and perinatal outcomes: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 2 356 402 pregnancies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Environmental health attitudes and behaviors: findings from a large pregnancy cohort study.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marleen M H J van GelderDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. M.vanGelder@ebh.umcn.nl
Reini W Bretveld
Jolt Roukema
Morac Steenhoek
Joris van Drongelen
Marc E A Spaanderman
Dick van Rumpt
Gerhard A Zielhuis
Chris M Verhaak
Nel Roeleveld

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo optimise the health of pregnant women and their children by evidence-based primary and secondary prevention, more scientific knowledge is needed. To overcome the methodological limitations of many studies on pregnancy and child health, which often use a retrospective design, we established the PRIDE (PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment) Study. METHODS AND

resultsThe PRIDE Study is a large prospective cohort study that aims at including 150 000-200 000 women in early pregnancy to study a broad range of research questions pertaining to pregnancy complications, maternal and child health, and adverse developmental effects in offspring. Women are invited to participate by their prenatal care provider before or at their first prenatal care visit and are asked to fill out web-based questionnaires in gestational weeks 8-10, 17, and 34, as well as biannually throughout childhood. In addition, a food frequency questionnaire and a paternal questionnaire are administered and medical records are consulted. Multiple validation studies will be conducted and paper-and-pencil questionnaires are available for women who cannot or do not want to participate through the Internet. For subgroups of participants, blood and saliva samples for genetic and biochemical analyses are being collected. The pilot phase, which started in July 2011, showed a response rate of 47%. Recruitment will eventually cover all of the Netherlands.

conclusionsWe expect that this study, which will be the largest birth cohort in the world so far, will provide new insights in the aetiology of disorders and diseases that originate in pregnancy. The PRIDE Study is open for collaboration.

Indexed as

AdultAsthmaAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutistic DisorderChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMiddle AgedNetherlandsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID23215710
PMCPMC3549557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.