Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23215027›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2013

Highly synergistic effect of sequential treatment with epigenetic and anticancer drugs to overcome drug resistance in breast cancer cells is mediated via activation of p21 gene expression leading to G2/M cycle arrest.

Sivakumar Vijayaraghavalu, Josephine Kamtai Dermawan, Venugopalan Cheriyath, Vinod Labhasetwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Key actors in cancer therapy: epigenetic modifiers.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2019
    Article
  15. Di-International journal of nanomedicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sivakumar VijayaraghavaluDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States.
Josephine Kamtai Dermawan
Venugopalan Cheriyath
Vinod Labhasetwar
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Drug Resistance In Cancer TherapyR01CA149359 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LABHASETWAR, VINOD D · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149359NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149359-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic alterations such as aberrant DNA methylation and histone modifications contribute substantially to both the cause and maintenance of drug resistance. These epigenetic changes lead to silencing of tumor suppressor genes involved in key DNA damage-response pathways, making drug-resistant cancer cells nonresponsive to conventional anticancer drug therapies. Our hypothesis is that treating drug-resistant cells with epigenetic drugs could restore the sensitivity to anticancer drugs by reactivating previously silenced genes. To test our hypothesis, we used drug-resistant breast cancer cells (MCF-7/ADR) and two epigenetic drugs that act via different mechanisms--5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine, DAC), a demethylating agent, and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor--in combination with doxorubicin. We show that the sequential treatment of resistant cells, first with an epigenetic drug (DAC), and then with doxorubicin, induces a highly synergistic effect, thus reducing the IC(50) of doxorubicin by several thousand fold. The sequential treatment caused over 90% resistant cells to undergo G2/M cell cycle arrest, determined to be due to upregulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression, which is responsible for cell-cycle regulation. The induction of p21(WAF1/CIP1) correlated well with the depletion of DNA methyltransferase1 (DNMT1), an enzyme that promotes methylation of DNA, suggesting that the p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene may have been methylated and hence is inactive in MCF-7/ADR cells. Microarray analysis shows expression of several tumor suppressor genes and downregulation of tumor promoter genes, particularly in sequentially treated resistant cells. Sequential treatment was found to be significantly more effective than simultaneous treatment, and DAC was more effective than SAHA in overcoming doxorubicin resistance. Synergistic effect with sequential treatment was also seen in drug-sensitive breast cancer cells, but the effect was significantly more pronounced in resistant cells. In conclusion, the sequential treatment of an epigenetic drug in combination with doxorubicin induces a highly synergistic effect that overcomes doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAzacitidineBreast NeoplasmsCarcinogensCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DivisionCell Line, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DecitabineDNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDoxorubicinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsAzacitidineCarcinogensCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DecitabineDNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1DNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNMT1 protein, humanDoxorubicinHydroxamic AcidsVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID23215027
PMCPMC3540132
OpenAlexW2077391866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.