Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23213561›Full record

ArticleISRN pediatrics2012

High neonatal mortality rates in rural India: what options to explore?

Ravi Prakash Upadhyay, Palanivel Chinnakali, Oluwakemi Odukoya, Kapil Yadav, Smita Sinha, S A Rizwan, Shailaja Daral, Vinoth G Chellaiyan, Vijay Silan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. State of newborn health in India.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Review
  6. Availability and Quality of Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care in Bangladesh.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ravi Prakash UpadhyayDepartment of Community Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi 110049, India.
Palanivel Chinnakali
Oluwakemi Odukoya
Kapil Yadav
Smita Sinha
S A Rizwan
Shailaja Daral
Vinoth G Chellaiyan
Vijay Silan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neonatal mortality rate in India is amongst the highest in the world and skewed towards rural areas. Nonavailability of trained manpower along with poor healthcare infrastructure is one of the major hurdles in ensuring quality neonatal care. We reviewed case studies and relevant literature from low and middle income countries and documented alternative strategies that have proved to be favourable in improving neonatal health. The authors reiterate the fact that recruiting and retaining trained manpower in rural areas by all means is essential to improve the quality of neonatal care services. Besides this, other strategies such as training of local rural healthcare providers and traditional midwives, promoting home-based newborn care, and creating community awareness and mobilization also hold enough potential to influence the neonatal health positively and efforts should be made to implement them on a larger scale. More research is demanded for innovations such as "m-health" and public-private partnerships as they have been shown to offer potential in terms of improving the standards of care. The above proposed strategy is likely to reduce morbidity among neonatal survivors as well.

Identifiers

PMID23213561
PMCPMC3506889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.