Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23213371›Full record

ArticleBiology open2012

Gene expression patterns specific to the regenerating limb of the Mexican axolotl.

James R Monaghan, Antony Athippozhy, Ashley W Seifert, Sri Putta, Arnold J Stromberg, Malcolm Maden, David M Gardiner, S Randal Voss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Material properties in regenerating axolotl limbs using inverse finite element analysis.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Rebuilding limbs, one cell at a time.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James R MonaghanDepartment of Biology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL 32611 , USA.
Antony Athippozhy
Ashley W Seifert
Sri Putta
Arnold J Stromberg
Malcolm Maden
David M Gardiner
S Randal Voss
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Research Resources for Model AmphibiansR24OD010435 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, JERAMIAH JAMES, VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2012 to 2025
$5.7M
GENOME RESOURCES FOR MODEL AMPHIBIANSR24RR016344 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI VOSS, STEPHEN RANDAL · 2002 to 2011
$3.5M
Validation of a Novel Genetic Model for Neural RegenerationRC2NS069480 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SCOTT, EDWARD W · 2009 to 2010
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016344NIH HHS R24 OD010435NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salamander limb regeneration is dependent upon tissue interactions that are local to the amputation site. Communication among limb epidermis, peripheral nerves, and mesenchyme coordinate cell migration, cell proliferation, and tissue patterning to generate a blastema, which will form missing limb structures. An outstanding question is how cross-talk between these tissues gives rise to the regeneration blastema. To identify genes associated with epidermis-nerve-mesenchymal interactions during limb regeneration, we examined histological and transcriptional changes during the first week following injury in the wound epidermis and subjacent cells between three injury types; 1) a flank wound on the side of the animal that will not regenerate a limb, 2) a denervated limb that will not regenerate a limb, and 3) an innervated limb that will regenerate a limb. Early, histological and transcriptional changes were similar between the injury types, presumably because a common wound-healing program is employed across anatomical locations. However, some transcripts were enriched in limbs compared to the flank and are associated with vertebrate limb development. Many of these genes were activated before blastema outgrowth and expressed in specific tissue types including the epidermis, peripheral nerve, and mesenchyme. We also identified a relatively small group of transcripts that were more highly expressed in innervated limbs versus denervated limbs. These transcripts encode for proteins involved in myelination of peripheral nerves, epidermal cell function, and proliferation of mesenchymal cells. Overall, our study identifies limb-specific and nerve-dependent genes that are upstream of regenerative growth, and thus promising candidates for the regulation of blastema formation.

Indexed as

AxolotlLimbRegenerationWound healing

Identifiers

PMID23213371
PMCPMC3507169
OpenAlexW2095706826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.