Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23212828›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2013

Influence of sociodemographic and socioeconomic features on treatment outcome in RCTs versus daily psychiatric practice.

R van der Lem, P M Stamsnieder, N J A van der Wee, T van Veen, F G Zitman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Standardization of health outcomes assessment for depression and anxiety: recommendations from the ICHOM Depression and Anxiety Working Group.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Correlation Between Psychiatric Disorders and Women's Lives.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R van der LemDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center/Rivierduinen, Albinusdreef 2, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. rosalind.van.der.lem@hetdok.nl
P M Stamsnieder
N J A van der Wee
T van Veen
F G Zitman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants in antidepressant and psychotherapy efficacy trials (AETs and PETs) for major depressive disorder (MDD) may limit the generalizability of the results. We compared trial participants with daily practice patients. We subsequently assessed the influence of socio-demographic and socioeconomic status on treatment outcome in daily practice.

methodsData on daily practice patients were derived through routine outcome monitoring (ROM). We included 626 patients with MDD according to the MINIplus. Distributions of age, gender, race, marital status and employment status were compared with participants in 63 selected AETs and PETs. Influence of these features on treatment outcome was explored through multivariate regression analysis.

resultsTrial participants were older, more often male (diff. 4 %, p = 0.05), white (diff. 4 %, p < 0.001) and not married (diff. 7 %, p = 0.003). Although significant, most differences were relatively small. However, the difference in employment status was striking: 34 % of the ROM patients were currently working versus 68 % of the trial participants (diff. 34 %, p < 0.001). Being employed contributed to a positive treatment outcome: OR 1.8 for response [50 % reduction of Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS)], OR 1.9 for remission (MADRS ≤10).

conclusionsEmployment status should be taken into account while interpreting results from randomized controlled trials and as predictor of treatment success in daily practice.

Indexed as

Social ClassSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAntidepressive AgentsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity Mental Health ServicesEmploymentFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleNetherlandsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.