Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23212605›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2013

Development of a comprehensive health-related needs assessment for adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Cheryl L Cox, Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman, Barth B Riley, Melissa M Hudson, Lauren J Williams, Wendy M Leisenring, Margie G Zacher, Les L Robison

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl L CoxDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA. cheryl.cox@stjude.org
Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman
Barth B Riley
Melissa M Hudson
Lauren J Williams
Wendy M Leisenring
Margie G Zacher
Les L Robison
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI SUZANNE J. BAKER · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
Investigating the Needs of Childhood Cancer Survivors: The UnReported ExperienceR21CA142921 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI COX, CHERYL LORANE · 2010 to 2011
$415k
NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS R21 CA142921NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727NCI NIH HHS U24 CA55727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExamine the construct validity, stability, internal consistency, and item-response performance of a self-report health needs assessment for adult survivors of childhood cancer.

methodsA 190-item mailed survey was completed by 1,178 randomly selected (stratified on age, diagnosis, time since diagnosis) Childhood Cancer Survivor Study participants (mean age, 39.66 [SD 7.71] years; time since diagnosis, 31.60 [SD 4.71] years). Minorities and rural residents were oversampled at a 2:1 ratio.

resultsThe final instrument included 135 items comprising nine unidimensional subscales (Psycho-emotional, Health System Concerns, Cancer-Related Health Information, General Health, Survivor Care and Support, Surveillance, Coping, Fiscal Concerns, and Relationships). Confirmatory factor analysis (n = 1,178; RMSEA = 0.020; 90 % CI = 0.019-0.020; CFI = 0.956; TLI = 0.955) and person-item fit variable maps established construct validity. Across subscales, Cronbach's alpha was 0.94-0.97, and the 4-week test-retest correlations were 0.52-0.91. In a Rasch analysis, item reliability was 0.97-0.99, person reliability was 0.80-0.90, and separation index scores were 2.00-3.01. Significant subscale covariates of higher need levels included demographics, diagnosis, and treatment exposures.

conclusionsThe Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Needs Assessment Questionnaire (CCSS-NAQ) is reliable and construct-valid, has strong item-response properties, and discriminates need levels. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The CCSS-NAQ potentially can be used to: (1) directly assess adult childhood cancer survivors' self-reported health-related needs, (2) identify individuals or subgroups with higher-level needs, (3) inform prevention and direct intervention strategies, and (4) facilitate prioritization of health-care resource allocation.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentQuality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPsychometricsSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival RateSurvivorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23212605
PMCPMC3568196
OpenAlexW2169023746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.