Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23212421›Full record

ReviewNature nanotechnology2012

Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials.

Marco P Monopoli, Christoffer Aberg, Anna Salvati, Kenneth A Dawson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature nanotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 892 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
892citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

892 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Green-synthesized Nanoparticles as Emerging Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Candidates: A Critical Review of Preclinical Evidence and Translational Prospects.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

832 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco P MonopoliCentre for BioNano Interactions, School of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Christoffer Aberg
Anna Salvati
Kenneth A Dawson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The search for understanding the interactions of nanosized materials with living organisms is leading to the rapid development of key applications, including improved drug delivery by targeting nanoparticles, and resolution of the potential threat of nanotechnological devices to organisms and the environment. Unless they are specifically designed to avoid it, nanoparticles in contact with biological fluids are rapidly covered by a selected group of biomolecules to form a corona that interacts with biological systems. Here we review the basic concept of the nanoparticle corona and its structure and composition, and highlight how the properties of the corona may be linked to its biological impacts. We conclude with a critical assessment of the key problems that need to be resolved in the near future.

Indexed as

Particle SizeAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBody FluidsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansKineticsNanoparticlesNanotechnologyProteinsBiocompatible MaterialsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23212421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.