Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23212240›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2013

Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study.

Carol Coole, Kathryn Radford, Mary Grant, Jane Terry

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. How primary care can help survivors of transient ischaemic attack and stroke return to work: focus groups with stakeholders from a UK community.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carol CooleFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, A Floor, South Block Link, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK. Carolyn.coole@nottingham.ac.uk
Kathryn Radford
Mary Grant
Jane Terry
University of Nottingham · GBStroke Association · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMore than 40 % of working age adults with stroke fail to return to work. The work context is a key factor in return to work, but little is known about the experiences of employers in supporting employees with stroke. The aim of this study was to explore return to work after stroke from the employer perspective, to identify key features associated with success and to seek participants' views regarding the role of healthcare in return to work.

methodsData was gathered through 18 semi-structured interviews with employer stakeholders and included small business owners, line managers, human resources and occupational health staff. Data was analysed thematically.

resultsThe main themes identified were: the impact of stroke on the employer, characteristics of the employee, communication, knowledge and information, experience of other stakeholders, integrating healthcare in return to work.

conclusionEmployers face complex emotional and practical issues when helping an employee return to work after stroke, for which many lack knowledge and experience. The range and quality of support networks that they access is variable and advice and support from clinicians is welcomed. Further research is necessary to investigate how such support could be funded and integrated within existing service provision.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRehabilitation, VocationalReturn to WorkStroke RehabilitationAdultHumansOccupational Health ServicesPersonnel ManagementQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID23212240
PMCPMC3734737
OpenAlexW2131726249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.