Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23211265›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Integrating online communities and social networks with computerised treatment for insomnia: a qualitative study.

Jo Middlemass, Zowie Davy, Kate Cavanagh, Conor Linehan, Kevin Morgan, Shaun Lawson, A Niroshan Siriwardena

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Cancer survivors' acceptability and perspectives on engagement with digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia: a mixed methods perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accessing support and empowerment online: The experiences of individuals with diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jo MiddlemassLincoln School of Health and Social Care, [corrected] University of Lincoln, Lincoln, USA.
Zowie Davy
Kate Cavanagh
Conor Linehan
Kevin Morgan
Shaun Lawson
A Niroshan Siriwardena

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsomnia is a common psychological complaint. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), although effective, is little used because of lack of trained providers. Computerised CBT-I (CCBT-I) may be a solution to this shortfall in access.

aimTo explore patient and health professional perspectives and the role of social networking, to develop a novel CCBT-I programme to increase access to this form of intervention. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative methods underpinned by the theory of planned behaviour in primary care in Lincolnshire and Nottinghamshire.

methodSemi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of health professionals and adults with insomnia.

resultsA total of 23 health professionals and 28 patients were interviewed. Features designed to engender trust and improve functionality were perceived to improve uptake and adherence to CCBT-I. Trust lay in programme accreditation; for professionals, trust derived from evidence of effectiveness; for patients, trust depended on the doctor-patient relationship, professional support, the quality of online peer support, and perceptions of risk. Patients wanted mobile applications; access in short periods; self-assessment; interactive, personalised information on sleep; and moderated contact with other users. Patients and practitioners differed over whether useful information could be distinguished from less useful or potentially incorrect information.

conclusionImproving uptake and adherence to online programmes for insomnia requires design features focusing on trust and functionality. Enabling greater patient control and interaction with other users and professionals may stimulate positive experiences of online therapy. CCBT-I would enable greater access to treatment but is limited by lack of online access or poor computer literacy.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCognitive Behavioral TherapyEnglandFamily PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInternetPatient Education as TopicSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersTherapy, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID23211265
PMCPMC3505418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.