Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23210723›Full record

ReviewDrug metabolism reviews2013

Xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptors involved in drug metabolism: a structural perspective.

Bret D Wallace, Matthew R Redinbo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug metabolism reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbial Metabolites as Ligands to Xenobiotic Receptors: Chemical Mimicry as Potential Drugs of the Future.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Xenobiotic metabolism and transport inJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bret D WallaceDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Matthew R Redinbo
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Improving CPT-11 Efficacy Using Structural BiologyR01CA098468 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDINBO, MATTHEW R · 2003 to 2018
$3.9M
Structure and Function of the Human Pregnane X ReceptorR01DK062229 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDINBO, MATTHEW · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA98468NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098468NIDDK NIH HHS DK62229NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenobiotic compounds undergo a critical range of biotransformations performed by the phase I, II, and III drug-metabolizing enzymes. The oxidation, conjugation, and transportation of potentially harmful xenobiotic and endobiotic compounds achieved by these catalytic systems are significantly regulated, at the gene expression level, by members of the nuclear receptor (NR) family of ligand-modulated transcription factors. Activation of NRs by a variety of endo- and exogenous chemicals are elemental to induction and repression of drug-metabolism pathways. The master xenobiotic sensing NRs, the promiscuous pregnane X receptor and less-promiscuous constitutive androstane receptor are crucial to initial ligand recognition, jump-starting the metabolic process. Other receptors, including farnesoid X receptor, vitamin D receptor, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor, glucocorticoid receptor, liver X receptor, and RAR-related orphan receptor, are not directly linked to promiscuous xenobiotic binding, but clearly play important roles in the modulation of metabolic gene expression. Crystallographic studies of the ligand-binding domains of nine NRs involved in drug metabolism provide key insights into ligand-based and constitutive activity, coregulator recruitment, and gene regulation. Structures of other, noncanonical transcription factors also shed light on secondary, but important, pathways of control. Pharmacological targeting of some of these nuclear and atypical receptors has been instituted as a means to treat metabolic and developmental disorders and provides a future avenue to be explored for other members of the xenobiotic-sensing NRs.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene ExpressionHumansInactivation, MetabolicLigandsModels, MolecularReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearStructure-Activity RelationshipXenobioticsLigandsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID23210723
PMCPMC4878694
OpenAlexW2018246447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.