Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23209711›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Ensemble response in mushroom body output neurons of the honey bee outpaces spatiotemporal odor processing two synapses earlier in the antennal lobe.

Martin F Strube-Bloss, Marco A Herrera-Valdez, Brian H Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-unit recordings in the stick insectFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Early olfactory, but not gustatory processing, is affected by the selection of heritable cognitive phenotypes in honey bee.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Olfactory system oscillations across phyla.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin F Strube-BlossMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary, Neuroethology, Jena, Germany. mstrube-bloss@ice.mpg.de
Marco A Herrera-Valdez
Brian H Smith
Arizona State University · USUniversity of Puerto Rico at Cayey · PR

Funding

Strengthening interdisciplinary research and training at the UPR CayeyP20MD006144 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PR CAYEY UNIVERSITY COLL · PI MEDINA, MARIO · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
BEHAVIORAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF OLFACTIONR01RR014166 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, BRIAN H. · 1998 to 2009
$3.0M
CRCNS: Dyanamic and Distributed Memory in OlfactionR01DC011422 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HUERTA, RAMON · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
CRCNS: Importance of temporal information for olfactory codesR01DC007997 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TERMAN, DAVID H · 2005 to 2007
$843k
NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR014166NCRR NIH HHS RR014166NIDCD NIH HHS DC007997NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007997NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011422NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural representations of odors are subject to computations that involve sequentially convergent and divergent anatomical connections across different areas of the brains in both mammals and insects. Furthermore, in both mammals and insects higher order brain areas are connected via feedback connections. In order to understand the transformations and interactions that this connectivity make possible, an ideal experiment would compare neural responses across different, sequential processing levels. Here we present results of recordings from a first order olfactory neuropile - the antennal lobe (AL) - and a higher order multimodal integration and learning center - the mushroom body (MB) - in the honey bee brain. We recorded projection neurons (PN) of the AL and extrinsic neurons (EN) of the MB, which provide the outputs from the two neuropils. Recordings at each level were made in different animals in some experiments and simultaneously in the same animal in others. We presented two odors and their mixture to compare odor response dynamics as well as classification speed and accuracy at each neural processing level. Surprisingly, the EN ensemble significantly starts separating odor stimuli rapidly and before the PN ensemble has reached significant separation. Furthermore the EN ensemble at the MB output reaches a maximum separation of odors between 84-120 ms after odor onset, which is 26 to 133 ms faster than the maximum separation at the AL output ensemble two synapses earlier in processing. It is likely that a subset of very fast PNs, which respond before the ENs, may initiate the rapid EN ensemble response. We suggest therefore that the timing of the EN ensemble activity would allow retroactive integration of its signal into the ongoing computation of the AL via centrifugal feedback.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod AntennaeBeesBrainBrain MappingElectrodesElectrophysiologyFluorescent DyesHoneyMushroom BodiesNeuronsOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPrincipal Component AnalysisSmellFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID23209711
PMCPMC3510213
OpenAlexW2007668168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.