ArticlePloS one2012
Multiparametric analysis of cell-free DNA in melanoma patients.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Value of Cell-Free Circulating DNA Profiling in Patients with Skin Diseases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Worsening of Flexion Range of Motion After Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Applicability of liquid biopsies to represent the mutational profile of tumor tissue from different cancer entities.Oncogene · 2021Article
- Molecular features of tumor-derived genetic alterations in circulating cell-free DNA in virtue of autopsy analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparison of Four Commercial Kits for Isolation of Urinary Cell-Free DNA and Sample Storage Conditions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Circulating cell-free DNA does not harbour a diagnostic benefit in cats with feline diffuse iris melanomas.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Monitoring immunoglobulin heavy chain and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement in cfDNA as minimal residual disease detection for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Liquid biopsy for early stage lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
- Development of a Method to Implement Whole-Genome Bisulfite Sequencing of cfDNA from Cancer Patients and a Mouse Tumor Model.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Assessment of the circulating cell-free DNA marker association with diagnosis and prognostic prediction in patients with lymphoma: a single-center experience.Annals of hematology · 2017Article
- Integrity and Quantity of Total Cell-Free DNA in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer: Correlation with Cytological Classification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA as Biomarkers for Cancer Detection.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2017Review
- Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Dogs with Mammary Tumors: Short and Long Fragments and Integrity Index.PloS one · 2017Article
- On-chip wavelength multiplexed detection of cancer DNA biomarkers in blood.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
- Cell-free circulating tumor DNA in cancer.Chinese journal of cancer · 2016Review
- Liquid biopsy utility for the surveillance of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients.Molecular oncology · 2016Review
- Liquid Biopsies for Assessing Metastatic Melanoma Progression.Critical reviews in oncogenesis · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-free DNA in blood (cfDNA) represents a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Total cfDNA concentration showed a scarce discriminatory power between patients and controls. A higher specificity in cancer diagnosis can be achieved by detecting tumor specific alterations in cfDNA, such as DNA integrity, genetic and epigenetic modifications.The aim of the present study was to identify a sequential multi-marker panel in cfDNA able to increase the predictive capability in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in comparison with each single marker alone. To this purpose, we tested total cfDNA concentration, cfDNA integrity, BRAF(V600E) mutation and RASSF1A promoter methylation associated to cfDNA in a series of 76 melanoma patients and 63 healthy controls. The chosen biomarkers were assayed in cfDNA samples by qPCR. Comparison of biomarkers distribution in cases and controls was performed by a logistic regression model in both univariate and multivariate analysis. The predictive capability of each logistic model was investigated by means of the area under the ROC curve (AUC). To aid the reader to interpret the value of the AUC, values between 0.6 and 0.7, between 0.71 and 0.8 and greater than 0.8 were considered as indicating a weak predictive, satisfactory and good predictive capacity, respectively. The AUC value for each biomarker (univariate logistic model) was weak/satisfactory ranging between 0.64 (BRAF(V600E)) to 0.85 (total cfDNA). A good overall predictive capability for the final logistic model was found with an AUC of 0.95. The highest predictive capability was given by total cfDNA (AUC:0.86) followed by integrity index 180/67 (AUC:0.90) and methylated RASSF1A (AUC:0.89).An approach based on the simultaneous determination of three biomarkers (total cfDNA, integrity index 180/67 and methylated RASSF1A) could improve the diagnostic performance in melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.