Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23209441›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

The genomes of the fungal plant pathogens Cladosporium fulvum and Dothistroma septosporum reveal adaptation to different hosts and lifestyles but also signatures of common ancestry.

Pierre J G M de Wit, Ate van der Burgt, Bilal Ökmen, Ioannis Stergiopoulos, Kamel A Abd-Elsalam, Andrea L Aerts, Ali H Bahkali, Henriek G Beenen, Pranav Chettri, Murray P Cox and 29 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 118 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 297 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative genomics of the extremophileFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.

Pierre J G M de WitLaboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Pierre.deWit@wur.nl
Ate van der Burgt
Bilal Ökmen
Ioannis Stergiopoulos
Kamel A Abd-Elsalam
Andrea L Aerts
Ali H Bahkali
Henriek G Beenen
Pranav Chettri
Murray P Cox
Erwin Datema
Ronald P de Vries
Braham Dhillon
Austen R Ganley
Scott A Griffiths
Yanan Guo
Richard C Hamelin
Bernard Henrissat
M Shahjahan Kabir
Mansoor Karimi Jashni
Gert Kema
Sylvia Klaubauf
Alla Lapidus
Anthony Levasseur
Erika Lindquist
Rahim Mehrabi
Robin A Ohm
Timothy J Owen
Asaf Salamov
Arne Schwelm
Elio Schijlen
Hui Sun
Harrold A van den Burg
Roeland C H J van Ham
Shuguang Zhang
Stephen B Goodwin
Igor V Grigoriev
Jérôme Collemare
Rosie E Bradshaw
Joint Genome Institute · USWageningen University & Research · NLMassey University · NZCentre for BioSystems Genomics · NLAix-Marseille Université · FRKeyGene (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of British Columbia · CAWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute · NLAgricultural Research Center · EGAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRHutt Hospital · NZKing Saud University · SAPurdue University West Lafayette · USSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sequenced and compared the genomes of the Dothideomycete fungal plant pathogens Cladosporium fulvum (Cfu) (syn. Passalora fulva) and Dothistroma septosporum (Dse) that are closely related phylogenetically, but have different lifestyles and hosts. Although both fungi grow extracellularly in close contact with host mesophyll cells, Cfu is a biotroph infecting tomato, while Dse is a hemibiotroph infecting pine. The genomes of these fungi have a similar set of genes (70% of gene content in both genomes are homologs), but differ significantly in size (Cfu >61.1-Mb; Dse 31.2-Mb), which is mainly due to the difference in repeat content (47.2% in Cfu versus 3.2% in Dse). Recent adaptation to different lifestyles and hosts is suggested by diverged sets of genes. Cfu contains an α-tomatinase gene that we predict might be required for detoxification of tomatine, while this gene is absent in Dse. Many genes encoding secreted proteins are unique to each species and the repeat-rich areas in Cfu are enriched for these species-specific genes. In contrast, conserved genes suggest common host ancestry. Homologs of Cfu effector genes, including Ecp2 and Avr4, are present in Dse and induce a Cf-Ecp2- and Cf-4-mediated hypersensitive response, respectively. Strikingly, genes involved in production of the toxin dothistromin, a likely virulence factor for Dse, are conserved in Cfu, but their expression differs markedly with essentially no expression by Cfu in planta. Likewise, Cfu has a carbohydrate-degrading enzyme catalog that is more similar to that of necrotrophs or hemibiotrophs and a larger pectinolytic gene arsenal than Dse, but many of these genes are not expressed in planta or are pseudogenized. Overall, comparison of their genomes suggests that these closely related plant pathogens had a common ancestral host but since adapted to different hosts and lifestyles by a combination of differentiated gene content, pseudogenization, and gene regulation.

Indexed as

GenomeHost-Pathogen InteractionsAdaptation, PhysiologicalBase SequenceCladosporiumFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalPhylogenyPinusPlant DiseasesSolanum lycopersicumFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23209441
PMCPMC3510045
OpenAlexW2145608020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.