Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23209255›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2012

Revised sequence and annotation of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 genome.

Wayne S Kontur, Wendy S Schackwitz, Natalia Ivanova, Joel Martin, Kurt Labutti, Shweta Deshpande, Hope N Tice, Christa Pennacchio, Erica Sodergren, George M Weinstock and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Divided Bacterial Genome: Structure, Function, and Evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Wayne S KonturDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Wendy S Schackwitz
Natalia Ivanova
Joel Martin
Kurt Labutti
Shweta Deshpande
Hope N Tice
Christa Pennacchio
Erica Sodergren
George M Weinstock
Daniel R Noguera
Timothy J Donohue

Funding

Sequencing the Human MicrobiomeU54HG004968 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, RICHARD K. · 2009 to 2012
$16.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS NIH U54HG004968NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA sequences of chromosomes I and II of Rhodobacter sphaeroides strain 2.4.1 have been revised, and the annotation of the entire genomic sequence, including both chromosomes and the five plasmids, has been updated. Errors in the originally published sequence have been corrected, and ~11% of the coding regions in the original sequence have been affected by the revised annotation.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataPlasmidsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRhodobacter sphaeroidesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23209255
PMCPMC3510577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.